This is exactly what I put yet get labelled on here as 'transphobic'.
I have absolutely no issue with anyone that is genuinely trans, what I have issue with is the overwhelming denial of science,
and the proportion of the 'trans community' masquerading as women to fulfill a fetish in public.
'Autogynephilia is the sexual
the proposed paraphilic tendency of someone who is anatomically male to be sexually aroused by the thought of being a female, sometimes framed as a form of gender identity disorder or transvestic fetishism'
A sexually aroused male LEGALLY entitled to access to female only spaces. That's what I take issue with, we can't differentiate genuine sufferers of gender dysphoria with fetishists acting out sexual deviancy in public is what the issue is.
The bolded bit is transphobic by the way. Implying that they are sexually deviant is just a horrible way to think about the issue, even if it is referring to a proportion of them. There are deviants in every every society, so why should we be against a whole society because of a few perceived bad eggs. Sounds like you should be anti all humans, not just anti-trans.
It is no different to being against the Asian community because a proportion of them groom kids, or against the Islamic community because some of them are terrorists. It is a bigoted thought process.
Saying that genetically they were born of a certain sex.
They have always felt that their gender is not the same as their birth sex.
These two statements can be said without contradicting each other.
Why should it matter if somebody wants to put female on their passport, how is this going against science. How is this anybody's business but that individual persons.