No. Because for one I didn't "scream". And for another the damage to his reputation has already been done. He should not have been suspended in the first place.
No, it's not. Normal due process is to investigate. It's not to suspend-first-ask-questions-later.
A caricaturist's reading of what I, and others, have said. It appeals to your emotion, and to those clicking like. But it's intellectually-dishonest, and merely puts a brick-wall between you and your debate-opponent.
You’ve mentioned cancel culture about twenty times. You’re screaming it from the rooftops via the internet.
Suspension pending an investigation is normal process, especially in sport.
I don’t agree with the suspension myself, but if the ECB feel there is a need for proper investigation and a pending suspension then I’m not going to rally against it.
Thing is, cancel culture does not exist like you and everyone else thinks it does.
As a society we are a lot more liberal and progressive, meaning there’s a lack of tolerance now for a certain set of views and actions. That’s a good thing, and for the most part we get the balance right as a society.
You’re coming across like you’re the enlightened one, yet it seems to me like you’re just parroting alt right media speak.
The lad said some horrific things on a public platform and is now facing the consequences. Nothing wrong in that.
