Fellaini to Chelsea, says his Dad?

Status
Not open for further replies.
It seems you missed the whole Fernando Torres transfer, Matt!

They could do that having disposed of player sales. And they will attempt to again in the next two windows to balance the books. But to assume that they'll offer Fellaini 100k a week plus - is in my view unlikely. They could afford maybe three or four players in that range. No more.

Also the amount of wages they are able to "write off" will increasingly put them under pressure - as they dispose of players ... the more they dispose - the more that new signings/replacements wages will be incorporated. Therefore this is a pressure on their wage bill.

Hence Pienaar, only offered £55k a week by them

via FT.com
Chelsea Football Club, which on Monday spent £76.5m on two players on the final day of the January transfer window, suffered a pre-tax loss of £70.4m last season.

The loss is 59 per cent higher than the previous season, when it paid £12.6m compensation to former manager Luiz Felipe Scolari and his coaching staff.

The club, owned by the Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich, on Friday issued its financial statement for the year to June 30 2010, which showed a rise of £3.1m in revenues to £209.5m.

Its (Paris: FR0010370163 - news) income from football activities came to £185.5m, a rise of only 0.1 per cent.

Taking out the compensation costs to Mr Scolari and his coaches, the wage bill has gone up by 12.8 per cent to £172.6m, and now accounts for 84 per cent of turnover.

That is considerably higher than most rivals, with the exception of Manchester City, which has a wages-to-turnover ratio of 107 per cent.

Chelsea this week paid £50m to buy Fernando Torres from Liverpool and £26.5m to buy David Luiz from the Portuguese club Benfica.

But Chelsea reduced its staff numbers from 573 to 548, including a reduction of four in the number of players and coaches.

Most of the wage bill increase was attributable to a tenfold rise in "other pension costs".

Operating losses were £68.6m, compared with £72.3m the previous year. While it made a profit on the sale of players of £28.6m in 2008-09, including Wayne Bridge and Steve Sidwell, the club made a loss of £980,000 on player sales last season.

The club's valuation of its players fell from £247.5m to £215.7m.

Chelsea's financial position appears to leave the club struggling to comply with Uefa's financial fair play rule, which comes into effect at the start of next season and which requires clubs to apply greater discipline to their spending.

Clubs will be allowed to incur losses of only €45m (£38m) in 2011-12 and 2012-13 if they are to avoid sanction. But Uefa will allow clubs to write off the value of the contracts of players signed before June 2010.
 
Last edited:
In summary, what I'd say to Fellaini's Dad in response to his comments, - does your son really want to sign for a club where there is real uncertainty if they will be in the Champions League in 2013 and he could be locked into a 6 year contract????

because its really difficult to see how they will fulfill the new club licencing regulations where we're sitting right now.

A 0.1% increase in turnover at Chelsea.

Says it all.
 
In summary, what I'd say to Fellaini's Dad in response to his comments, - does your son really want to sign for a club where there is real uncertainty if they will be in the Champions League in 2013 and he could be locked into a 6 year contract????

because its really difficult to see how they will fulfill the new club licencing regulations where we're sitting right now.

A 0.1% increase in turnover at Chelsea.

Says it all.

They'll be in the champs league before us. That's why he'd go. Oh and challenge for titles.

As for Chelsea only offering Pienaar £55k...Im sure that was more down to him going to be a bench warmer there and they did the old "we're Chelsea, take what we give you cos its better club Everton" spiel rather than them being skint
 
They'll be in the champs league before us. That's why he'd go. Oh and challenge for titles.

As for Chelsea only offering Pienaar £55k...Im sure that was more down to him going to be a bench warmer there and they did the old "we're Chelsea, take what we give you cos its better club Everton" spiel rather than them being skint

Superficial view of things there lad. Not saying that you're wrong...

However, after all the hoodoo over the EFC accounts, then to claim that Chelsea don't have real tangible issues on their wage bill would be wrong.
 
Can't stand this shoite that gets written about transfer rumours and such.

22m would be robbery, would have been shafted if we sold him for that. Downing cost more than that FFS!
 
a) Chelsea are pretty well stocked for midfielders, with Lampard, Mereiles, Ramires, Essien, Mikel, Romeu and McEachran.

b) Fellaini doesn't count as a homegrown player. I'd imagine that they'd be looking to recruit talent schooled in this country to satisfy the inevitable UEFA quota rules and to help replace the old-guard of Lampard, Terry and Cole.

c) Last year's net spend was £62.7m. Even with Champions' League prize money, would they spend such a large amount again so soon in view of Financial Fair Play rules?

d) Although he plays in a more advanced position, they've also just signed Marko Marin for £6.5m to compound my previous arguments.

e) I believe that we offered him a 5 year contract to keep him at the club rather than to simply to protect his value.

f) The People make stories up.

g) Felli's dad didn't want him to sign the new deal, but he didn't listen to him then either.

h) He's still only 24 and has got plenty of time ahead of him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top