Everton Youth Teams Thread

Re 'Legs post on loanees /u21s , every team moans about the lack of a decent u21 league , including Rhino, yet they don't change it. Two simple changes, increase number from 12 to 18 teams, arrange matches in line with PL fixtures whenever possible so that U21s travel away with first team , kick off 1100 return with first team. Maybe even play in same stadium if weather/pitch condition allow. Additionally,create a meaningful Euro Competition , there may already be one. The article reinforces the point of needing to balance youngsters getting 1st team exposure on loan with making sure they are being developed properly - why would you believe that youngsters will be developed better at a lower level club ? We seemed to have fewer loanees out this season, and all 5 are within a reasonably short travelling distance of FF, I'm not sure if this is deliberate or not , but it means their development is more closely monitored.
 
Yeah. Funny the way in 12/13 season moyes wouldnt play him at home to norwich when gibson, neville and mirallas were all unavailable and gave a half retired tommy hitszelperger a game instead, but happy to throw him in at the deep end away to arsenal (but then drop him for osman a few days later).

Another huge show of faith was to play him out of position on the left side against spurs, pitting him toe to toe with the best player in the country at the time.

A couple of Barkley's other scant cameos that season were sub appearances in games we were chasing like Chelsea at home and stoke away.

But the games against relegation fodder at home oh no ross wasnt ready for them ...

It was as if moyes wanted to prove a point against the toughest opposition that he wasnt ready, he set him up to fail

None of them understood how, even when they were 3 up in that u21 game, they were still losing the youth battle. 22 year old Texeira was up against 16 year old Walsh, 21 year old Ilori against 16 year old Evans, and they were all laughing at how it looked like 'men v boys' out there. They confuse winning games in the u 21 league with academy success. First team players is the only measure of success and Lucerpool have only had Flanagan since Jay Spearing (questionable whether either are/were good e Pugh) Benitez started a policy of artificially inflating the quality of their academy by buying in young Spanish players. None of them made the grade though and they just blocked other players. Their academy is really poor and now they have consciously started to behave like Chelsea and operate a cattle farm for profit purposes. The likes of Chelsea and Liverpool are low balling clubs in need of money (apparently one of the reasons Barnsley offered Everton Holgate because they knew we paid a fair price) taking on talent in the hope someone else will improve them on loan and they can sell them for a profit. Virtually a cost free way of making money and ensuring, if you hoarde enough like Chelsea do that they don't let the next Bale end up at United or City. What they fail to realise is s player like Be even if they got him young would never turn into Bale in their system. He is precisely the player he is, similarly Barkley and Stones because they all came up through good academies with a clear path to the first team.
 
Re 'Legs post on loanees /u21s , every team moans about the lack of a decent u21 league , including Rhino, yet they don't change it. Two simple changes, increase number from 12 to 18 teams, arrange matches in line with PL fixtures whenever possible so that U21s travel away with first team , kick off 1100 return with first team. Maybe even play in same stadium if weather/pitch condition allow. Additionally,create a meaningful Euro Competition , there may already be one. The article reinforces the point of needing to balance youngsters getting 1st team exposure on loan with making sure they are being developed properly - why would you believe that youngsters will be developed better at a lower level club ? We seemed to have fewer loanees out this season, and all 5 are within a reasonably short travelling distance of FF, I'm not sure if this is deliberate or not , but it means their development is more closely monitored.

Not bad suggestions, however the difficulty they have is that the reserves league doesn't always correspond to the fist team league as to who's in the premier league. (IE Fulham have always had a decent reserve league).

Your idea of more games is sensible though. Goodness only knows why they aren't playing more games.

IN all honesty, though on principle it pains me to say it, but allowing "b" teams to play competitive football would be a big step forward. I think certain criteria would need to be met, such as playing for 10 consecutive seasons in the top flight, showing that x amount of the annual budget was spent on youth development particularly in the local community. X amount of players born within X mile radius of the teams ground to ensure it was an opportunity for young local players.

After that, am I in favour, even if they teams have to start in the Conference North/South? Absolutely. I understand that clubs of sides down there say it's an insult but I can see advantages. If you take Liverpool/Manchester United. If they were playing at a conference side like Ebbsfleet who average 3-400 fans, even their reserve teams would probably bolster that attendance significantly. It would be a real cash earner for clubs at the lower end of the spectrum, and a fantastic experience for them to play in front of such a big crowd.

I actually believe that B teams would be better supported than people make out. ON Weekends when Everton were away, if they had a home fixture I think people would go and watch them if it were a competitive match.
 
None of them understood how, even when they were 3 up in that u21 game, they were still losing the youth battle. 22 year old Texeira was up against 16 year old Walsh, 21 year old Ilori against 16 year old Evans, and they were all laughing at how it looked like 'men v boys' out there. They confuse winning games in the u 21 league with academy success. First team players is the only measure of success and Lucerpool have only had Flanagan since Jay Spearing (questionable whether either are/were good e Pugh) Benitez started a policy of artificially inflating the quality of their academy by buying in young Spanish players. None of them made the grade though and they just blocked other players. Their academy is really poor and now they have consciously started to behave like Chelsea and operate a cattle farm for profit purposes. The likes of Chelsea and Liverpool are low balling clubs in need of money (apparently one of the reasons Barnsley offered Everton Holgate because they knew we paid a fair price) taking on talent in the hope someone else will improve them on loan and they can sell them for a profit. Virtually a cost free way of making money and ensuring, if you hoarde enough like Chelsea do that they don't let the next Bale end up at United or City. What they fail to realise is s player like Be even if they got him young would never turn into Bale in their system. He is precisely the player he is, similarly Barkley and Stones because they all came up through good academies with a clear path to the first team.

All of this is correct. They are too thick to grasp that. I've had mnay telling me "we had a young team too". When you point out they had not a single under 18 player in their side/squad, while we had I think 7 or 8 says it all.

Benitez turned them away from recruiting local talent. The problem is to get to the level Everton are at takes an awful lot of time. Maybe 4-5 years to begin to build up. You can then be waiting another 10 years for that to bear fruit. We are now starting to see the benefit of moving to FF for example with the increasing quality of the 7/8 year olds who have always trained at it.

They are miles behind and have no idea how to redress it. They pay tens of millions of pounds for players who sit in their under 21's and make them seem stronger than they are. This blocks the opportunities of their young players. It's great for us though.
 
IN all honesty, though on principle it pains me to say it, but allowing "b" teams to play competitive football would be a big step forward. I think certain criteria would need to be met, such as playing for 10 consecutive seasons in the top flight, showing that x amount of the annual budget was spent on youth development particularly in the local community. X amount of players born within X mile radius of the teams ground to ensure it was an opportunity for young local players.

Not for me, I prefer the idea of clubs being allowed to partner with existing clubs though.

So for example Everton could partner with Tranmere.

We supply a maximum of 11 players, all of whom have to be home-grown and U23. We are allowed to pay their wages and they can still train at Finch Farm (indeed Tranmere could).

It would let young players to have access to the best facilities whist playing competitive football. Loans would be for full seasons to ensure continuity. If the partner club gets promoted to the same league the arrangement is suspended and if the teams are drawn together in the cups then all loan players are eligible to play against their parent clubs.
 
All of this is correct. They are too thick to grasp that. I've had mnay telling me "we had a young team too". When you point out they had not a single under 18 player in their side/squad, while we had I think 7 or 8 says it all.

Benitez turned them away from recruiting local talent. The problem is to get to the level Everton are at takes an awful lot of time. Maybe 4-5 years to begin to build up. You can then be waiting another 10 years for that to bear fruit. We are now starting to see the benefit of moving to FF for example with the increasing quality of the 7/8 year olds who have always trained at it.

They are miles behind and have no idea how to redress it. They pay tens of millions of pounds for players who sit in their under 21's and make them seem stronger than they are. This blocks the opportunities of their young players. It's great for us though.

Who would you say is the first academy graduate to benefit fully from the Finch Farm upgrade? Obviously Rooney was just a freak talent, Rodwell just seemed to have natural poise whilst the likes of Vaughan and Anichebe clearly made it on their respective gifts of speed and strength (although both have failed somewhat to keep their youthful level). Now though it feels like we are grooming players towards the first team due to our improved coaching rather than just the law of natural averages (eg. Duffy was tall so he got a few first team appearances which was seemingly nothing to do with our coaching as his football wasn't so good.). The likes of Browning, Dowell Ledson Garbutt and obviously Barkley all seem comfortable with the ball at their feet and have no obvious natural advantages other than just really good technique. Would you say Barkley is the first of a new breed or just a great talent that made it out of the old system like Rooney?
 
Not for me, I prefer the idea of clubs being allowed to partner with existing clubs though.

So for example Everton could partner with Tranmere.

We supply a maximum of 11 players, all of whom have to be home-grown and U23. We are allowed to pay their wages and they can still train at Finch Farm (indeed Tranmere could).

It would let young players to have access to the best facilities whist playing competitive football. Loans would be for full seasons to ensure continuity. If the partner club gets promoted to the same league the arrangement is suspended and if the teams are drawn together in the cups then all loan players are eligible to play against their parent clubs.

tranmere are at too low a level now
 
Not for me, I prefer the idea of clubs being allowed to partner with existing clubs though.

So for example Everton could partner with Tranmere.

We supply a maximum of 11 players, all of whom have to be home-grown and U23. We are allowed to pay their wages and they can still train at Finch Farm (indeed Tranmere could).

It would let young players to have access to the best facilities whist playing competitive football. Loans would be for full seasons to ensure continuity. If the partner club gets promoted to the same league the arrangement is suspended and if the teams are drawn together in the cups then all loan players are eligible to play against their parent clubs.

Well yes. The dilemma of that I suppose is the general ethics for the club who are the lower team. They may have several of their first team training away from the club and being registered to another club. This in my view is more of an affront to them than the alleged B league.

I think informal relations work quite well. I am still in favour of sides being allowed to field reserve teams competitively.
 
Who would you say is the first academy graduate to benefit fully from the Finch Farm upgrade? Obviously Rooney was just a freak talent, Rodwell just seemed to have natural poise whilst the likes of Vaughan and Anichebe clearly made it on their respective gifts of speed and strength (although both have failed somewhat to keep their youthful level). Now though it feels like we are grooming players towards the first team due to our improved coaching rather than just the law of natural averages (eg. Duffy was tall so he got a few first team appearances which was seemingly nothing to do with our coaching as his football wasn't so good.). The likes of Browning, Dowell Ledson Garbutt and obviously Barkley all seem comfortable with the ball at their feet and have no obvious natural advantages other than just really good technique. Would you say Barkley is the first of a new breed or just a great talent that made it out of the old system like Rooney?

What I always found quite interesting was Ledsons age group were very strong. Probably the strongest we have had since 1998. They were also the first age group to have played all of their football at FF from under 7's upwards. So as opposed to it being a player I think what we can see is there has been an increasing quality from those who have benefitted from the use of FF. Whether that continues beyond our (current) under 19's/18's group is still to be seen, if it does we are in very good shape and may well be left with so many good young players we won't know what to do with them!

I suspect there are other factors alongside this. Moyes built an infrastructure particular around scouting, but also the stability that has come from having a consistent owner and manager is a really big factor. It means the same sort of scouts are employed, the same youth coaches, the same youth schedules and routines are all built in. You don't get a new manager who completes overhauls the youth side of things and brings in half a dozen foreign lads into the under 16/18's every year if you keep the manager. Or Worse still you don't get a manager like Harry Redknap who ignores the youth side of things.

All of these factors were very beneficial. I know it's hard to believe, but what Manchester United liked about Moyes was the structure he had built up at Everton in the youth levels. They are really struggling currently and felt he could help rejuvenate there structure. With having the same manager you keep the same scouts, who then often build relationships with the local community, local managers of clubs, schools etc. Scouting is a lot about network building, gaining trust which is best built over time. A lot of people under estimate this when they call on us sacking managers after half a dozen bad results. We would lose a lot of what we've built up, and the presence we have in the community in Liverpool.

Martinez has taken the youth side of things onto the next level. Moyes was more interested in finding the 1 special player every 2-3 years. Martinez is looking to get through a greater quantity and has involved himself even more with the youth side of things. So I think that factor has helped.

Finally the current under 18's/19's age group were also just very good. Sometimes you can just get a batch of players who are really strong and we have been quite lucky in that regard. While FF has made a big impact I am not sure we will say age groups as strong as theirs every year but we will see the overall quality being better than it probably has been a over the previous decade.

You are right though, I don't think FF will necessarily give us more Rooneys. He would have come through at any time, at any training ground (he trained exclusively at Netherton as a young player). Likewise Barkley was another freakishly good player. What I do think it will do though is raise the overall standard of players we have as a collective. Training with the first team with the quality of pitches we have will push all graduates up. So for the likes of Ledson, Dowell, Walsh and Kenny that has been a big advantage and they are probably the first to have benefitted from it.
 
I really don't understand why u21 teams don't push more to play European opposition such as Barca B, Bayern 2 etc.

I understand they tried a trophy a couple of years ago and it is hard to generate interest.

As different company's have different systems (e.g Barca B & Bayern 2 play in competitive leagues and not "age group leagues") they cant pit the champions of each country's 2nd string together.

I am probably swaying more towards the idea of a B team I think although it would have to be beneficial to all the football league clubs and the B teams would have to start at a certain point (conference North/South maybe?) and cannot be entered into the league cup or fa cup.
You could even "charge" the B teams a certain fee to play in that league and the charge gets evenly distributed between the football league clubs
 
I really don't understand why u21 teams don't push more to play European opposition such as Barca B, Bayern 2 etc.

I understand they tried a trophy a couple of years ago and it is hard to generate interest.

As different company's have different systems (e.g Barca B & Bayern 2 play in competitive leagues and not "age group leagues") they cant pit the champions of each country's 2nd string together.

I am probably swaying more towards the idea of a B team I think although it would have to be beneficial to all the football league clubs and the B teams would have to start at a certain point (conference North/South maybe?) and cannot be entered into the league cup or fa cup.
You could even "charge" the B teams a certain fee to play in that league and the charge gets evenly distributed between the football league clubs

we do play in an u21 international comp. only in its second season though so early days.
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/...ernational-cup-2015-16-fixtures-released.html
 
I really don't understand why u21 teams don't push more to play European opposition such as Barca B, Bayern 2 etc.

I understand they tried a trophy a couple of years ago and it is hard to generate interest.

As different company's have different systems (e.g Barca B & Bayern 2 play in competitive leagues and not "age group leagues") they cant pit the champions of each country's 2nd string together.

I am probably swaying more towards the idea of a B team I think although it would have to be beneficial to all the football league clubs and the B teams would have to start at a certain point (conference North/South maybe?) and cannot be entered into the league cup or fa cup.
You could even "charge" the B teams a certain fee to play in that league and the charge gets evenly distributed between the football league clubs

In all honesty I think what they are missing is the competitive edge. There are quite a few competitions, but in the end when they are playing in front of a few dozen people who don't care so much do they really get to know how it feels to win and lose? Are they having abuse hurled at them from opposing fans, or making mistakes which cost the tea lady their job etc. In many ways it's important to shield people from these realities where possible until a certain age, but in the end I do think our young players are just too closeted.

The difficulty with allowing B teams would be that how do you restrict it in terms of number of teams, and also how do you stop teams just fielding some of the 30 odd loan players Chelsea currently have. I think that does demean the league. My solution would be to have a quota of players within a squad that had to be born within 20 miles of your ground (or been at the club since say under 12/13's) of say 75% of a 24 man squad allowance. Or you could only use 6 players outside of these rules. Also you can only use 6 players above the age of 21.

I would also have a rule that you'd have to have done ten years consecutively in the Premier league before you could apply and show you are spending X amount of your budget on youth development work in the local area. I think this would allow for it to be the fairest way that was still respectful to the football league.

Also for players like Tony Hibbert a B team would be ideal for him to finish off before his retirement and he could pass on a lot to the younger players.
 

Similar Threads

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top