joey_macmo
Player Valuation: £35m
I'd expect you not to understand my comment and you did not disappoint......
Standard high handed reply that offers nothing to the debate as usual
I'd expect you not to understand my comment and you did not disappoint......
well watch the programme then the numbers quoted were astounding ok!I find it absolutely insane that this post from the esk gets attacked when these posts defending incorrect figures and statements surround it
Perhaps too strong a word, but definition number 3 covers it.....
3.
opposition or resistance to an idea, plan, project,
your right pesky devils those Vikings!They came to rape and plunder.
Still way too high imo!The figures are to June.
That's not accurate as the ones in work no one has dared to publish what I call the oncost figures the in work benefits if they are in low paid jobs etc in work benefits can be tax credits, Housing benefits etc etc until those figures are produced is any immigration a + or a minus on the figures, not just on contruburtions the benefits they claim listed above?Thanks for the personal comment.
The question is whether immigration is good for the economy or not? It has been proved beyond all reasonable doubt that immigrants are net contributors to the economy, and therefore benefit the economy.
Now people say what about the effect on public services? Conveniently the Government use this a reason to turn public opinion as its much easier to blame the immigrants than it is to fund public services to the levels that provide decent services for all. I'm not discounting that there are regional and local difficulties but the cause is the political decision not to fund the public service providers be it the NHS or the local councils to meet the need created.
The Government knows that immigration is a positive for the economy yet at the same time makes the political decision not to provide the resources required alongside any growth of local populations.
It could easily be remedied if the Government made it a political priority, but they don't and have allowed immigration to be used for the Brexit cause rather than defending it. It's political cowardice.
Interesting letter from leaders of the UK food industry in The Times today. Not sure if it's been posted previously:
MIGRANT LABOUR CALL
Sir, The result of the EU referendum presents particular challenges as well as opportunities for the UK food chain. A settlement that recognises the critical role of the UK food chain will demonstrate how Brexit can be beneficial not just for our sector but for the wider economy too. We represent the four UK farming unions and 71 leading food businesses, with a collective turnover of more than £92 billion and employing more than 925,000 people across the UK.
For our sector, maintaining tariff-free access to the EU single market is vital. It is where 75 per cent of our food exports go, so all our farming and food businesses wish to achieve this outcome. The sector needs access to EU and non-EU seasonal and permanent labour, alongside assurances that EU workers already working permanently in the UK are allowed to remain.
This access to labour is essential as it underpins the UK food chain’s timely delivery of high-quality, affordable food to consumers. We urge the government to pursue both these goals, for the benefit of the whole of society and the economy.
Mark Allen, CEO, Dairy Crest; David Potts, CEO, Wm Morrison; Mike Coupe, CEO, J Sainsbury; Tomas Pietrangeli, managing director, Arla Foods; Steve Rowe, CEO, M&S; Andrew McInnes, managing director, Müller Milk & Ingredients; Giles Turrel, CEO, Weetabix; Richard Clothier, managing director, Wyke Farms; Meurig Raymond, president, NFU; Allan Bowie, president, NFU Scotland; Barclay Bell, president, Ulster Farmers Union; Stephen James, president, NFU Cymru. Plus a further 63 food businesses
Esk just I played the BBC DP today here are the figures quoted -Joey you need to revise your figures.
ONS said a total of 650,000 in the year to June of which 284,000 were from the EU. Net migration was 300,000 three times the Government target.
22,000 Bulgarian and Romanians registered for NI numbers.
189,000 of the 284,000 came to work.
Not exactly. The vast majority of the food they produce is for the UK market. Of the bit they export 75% goes to the EU.Just so I've read that right.
That's a load of big businesses asking to keep the endless flow of cheaper european labour alive so they can send food to Europe for them to eat?
Just so I've read that right.
That's a load of big businesses asking to keep the endless flow of cheaper european labour alive so they can send food to Europe for them to eat?
Just so I've read that right.
That's a load of big businesses asking to keep the endless flow of cheaper european labour alive so they can send food to Europe for them to eat?
That's not accurate as the ones in work no one has dared to publish what I call the oncost figures the in work benefits if they are in low paid jobs etc in work benefits can be tax credits, Housing benefits etc etc until those figures are produced is any immigration a + or a minus on the figures, not just on contruburtions the benefits they claim listed above?
they even leave and get certain benefits sent back home?
You read right. You couldn't make some of this stuff up really, could you? Some busineses are being cringeworthy in their attempts to avoid having to sort themselves out and pay appropriate salaries to people employed on proper contracts (not zero hour slave labour nonsense). Some of these latter-day Fagins are now staring down the barrel - - and I'm delighted.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.