Whistlin' Dixie
Player Valuation: £50m
Well, that sums everything up neatly...
That's right, I decided using my own observations and my own judgement - not entirely on what some planets tried to palm me off with.
#Mindofmeown
Well, that sums everything up neatly...
That's right, I decided using my own observations and my own judgement - not entirely on what some planets tried to palm me off with.
#Mindofmeown
Show me where I said that please? I said it's what they do for a living...
How noble of them. Time to accept the result. The argument wasn't good enough before, it isn't now.
Oh yeah, those racist, fascist lies? Bad leavers...And they call them 'remoaners' as well y'know?
Where did I say I was neutral, or make any statement alluding to it? Once again, show me?
Oh, that's right... I didn't. I asked Pienaar's if the statement he made was a claimed neutrality. And he's been far from neutral; although a lot less rabid than one or two I could mention
Why should I pull up @Old Blue 2 ? Don't agree entirely with what was said about the dough, the amount and what it could/should be spent on - but I disagree with paying the EU anything anyway.
Article is mostly about Trump but applies with the EU debate.
In the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Article is mostly about Trump but applies with the EU debate.
In the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
Article is mostly about Trump but applies with the EU debate.
In the age of Trump, why bother teaching students to argue logically?
These type of articles are pointless. Both sides think the other lacks logic.
Not that Universities teach logic nowadays anyway.
That does miss the point a bit.
I think the key thing linking Trump and Brexit is that in both cases you had a clear majority of the people who had run the two countries for the past thirty years all on one side of the argument, and that these people who themselves had a long and demonstrable record of fibs over a wide variety of issues. Both elections then came down to a choice between one side that was responsible for the state the country was in and one side that mostly wasn't; it should surprise few people that the people who weren't responsible won.
I wonder how many personal or political decisions rely purely on logic.
Evidence regarding this claim or do you just know?
In the EU debates, you had Gove actually say the words "people are sick of experts".
It's actually insane. I mean, the clue is in the word "expert" really - what's the point in knowing anything about anything if what you say is completely ignored because you bothered to actually learn about it?
We live in a disgustingly stupid world, infested by idiots.
1. You said you're not remotely arsed who said what. That's a pretty conclusive acceptance.
2. The point is that the failings of th campaign have been accepted by one side but not by the other yet you claim balance.
3. See point 2
4. I apologise I thought by having a go at someone for not being neutral you may have been claiming to be so yourself.
5. I thought you probably pull him up considering you acknowledged what he said was a lie 1 page later.
And a bargain at twice that, eh?![]()

Go have a look at the humanities. It's just God awful such as gender studies.
On my course we had to learn about racism and sexism. The argumentation was awful. The lack of logic from the professors and the students was astounding.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.