lol
Simpson took a company making good money with a healthy balance sheet and cash reserves and in 2001 racked up the biggest annual loss in UK corporate history at that time - £5BN. Most of the loss being "goodwill impairment" due to their complete mismanagement of their US acquisitions, which they compounded by paying for in cash rather than equity. Blaming Brown for the demise of Marconi is delusional
Nicely wiki'd.....now if you want to know what actually happened then you can listen to someone like myself who worked as a senior Director with Marconi or you can just go and wiki anything you want and try and score points. The problem you face is that only a couple of dozen people actually knew what happened and I was one of them.....
As you will only believe wiki, try this for size.......
The Telecoms crash was a stock market crash which occurred in 2001. It is sometimes confused with the Dot Com crash which happened at around the same time. Unlike the dot com crash however, the telecoms sector relied on long engineering research and development cycles, and the development companies on the telecom operators buying software maintenance contracts and upgrade paths. The dot com boom was caused by people investing money in ideas that were unrealistic.
Limited license auctions
At the beginning of 2000, mobile network operators in Europe, were offered auction of the 3G radio spectrum.[1] A similar auction had been applied in the United States the year before and had to be re-run when the winners defaulted on their bids.[2] Gordon Brown,[3] the minister responsible for the auctions (the then Chancellor of the Exchequer), used the same New York based firm that set up the failed/re-run auctions to host the auctions in the UK and paid 750,000 pounds from the public purse for them to do so.
The nature of the auctions was designed to increase competitive pressure on bidders by offering fewer licenses than the number of operators likely to bid and in some cases using sealed bid auctions. This put the telephone operators in a difficult position, because if they lost the auction they were out of the next technological phase of the business. They therefore took risks and made high bids, incurring large debt. In the UK auctions raised £22.5 billion[4] (GBP) and around £30 billion (GBP) in Germany. Some estimate the damage caused by the auctions of telecom spectrum (previously administration fees were charged for spectrum usage --- with public service conditions such as emergency cover bundled with the usage certificates --- with the raison d'être being public service provision and that profits from the companies proving the service would be taxable) to be as high as 3 trillion dollars worldwide.[5]
Debt and subsequent loss of stockmarket confidence
The stock market lost confidence,[6] partly due to the concept that telecoms were similar to dot com (both were categorised as 'high technology' in the listings) and share prices tumbled. As they did so the ratio of debt to assets based on share price changed making the telephone operators effective credit rating look insecure.
The telecom developers were now in a quandary. They had invested heavily over the years in research and development to keep pace with changing technology, and the telecom operators were no longer in a position to pay the maintenance and upgrades on the ordinary landline equipment, let alone buy the new.[7] Within a year 100,000 jobs were lost in telecoms support and development across Europe with 30,000 coming from the UK.[8]
