Well why not bring it up earlier?
Because it was implied.
It's like a footballer being sent off for kicking someone repeatedly in the head and moaning about why the referee didn't tell him it wasn't allowed beforehand.
Well why not bring it up earlier?
Ah yes, how silly of me.No it means you didn't know about it until very recently. To a lot of people it didn't even need mentizoning because lots knew the score. Including the leave voters I know.
And here's me thinking people are only talking about it after the vote because it didn't come up until then.Because it was implied.
It's like a footballer being sent off for kicking someone repeatedly in the head and moaning about why the referee didn't tell him it wasn't allowed beforehand.
Blair's a joke and any party that elected him, new or otherwise, would be laughed out of town. The fellers a war criminal. It'd be like having Radovan Karadzic as leader.
The Chilcot paper all but called him a liar but with out using that four letter word.
To bypass parliament with a law - pretty much any law - is absolutely unheard of, yet people think this should have happened.
It really is just all about keeping out of the court of human rights on a war crimes charge now for him.The Chilcot paper all but called him a liar but with out using that four letter word.
I voted Remain and I think leaving the EU is a mistake for reasons of trade, but I'm uneasy about all this talk of parliament blocking the expressed wishes of the people.
It was always a stitch up. The 'will of the people' doesn't exist. They wouldn't have allowed the referendum unless they could benefit from either 'result'. For a football forum the term 'moving the goalposts' is extremely apt in this case.
Pretty sure they will do the necessary to pass an act to invoke C50, but it will be alongside/not until, some of the key negotiations with the EU have been concluded.
All of which will be a protracted dance whilst we just get on with stuff.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.