I wouldn't put it that wayTransferable skills. Jack of all trades Master of none.

I wouldn't put it that wayTransferable skills. Jack of all trades Master of none.

Things change though. The concept of a job for life is not something children should be going into life expecting, and indeed nor should staying with one employer for life. Transferrable skills are key.
Good post.No offence bruce, but this is exactly the sort of tripe that has helped lead to Trump, Johnson and all the rest of the rubbish these past few years.
The concept of a job for life - or at least the reasonable chance of career security over a lifetime - is something that we need if we are going require people to have mortgages, to get into debt that requires a long time to pay back (student loans etc), for some businesses to invest in production in a particular area and so on.
If you want to have transferrable skills, flexible job markets, gig work (and all the rest of the things that sharp business minds use to cover up the fact that their competitive brilliance is mainly down to them no longer paying a fair rate of tax) then stuff like homes, transport, education and quite a few other things have to be provided to people. Businesses have to have areas where they can set up and operate, to allow their costs to be low enough to reasonably compete against giant firms who enjoy massive advantages.
Otherwise you just end up with an increasing number of people who can't afford to get a stake in society, whose economic future is bleak and who have every reason to vote against the people who think there isn't anything wrong. You end up with local businesses starting to fail, unable to compete against mega firms whose power, wealth and influence allow them to further cut costs, which has an impact on their employees and what rival businesses remain. Most importantly you end up with a government that has a perfect storm of lower taxes, increased welfare spending and much greater corruption because of the rewards on offer.
In short, you end up with the UK in 2021.
Just what Hydek, Freidman and eventually Reagan and Thatcher wanted.In short, you end up with the UK in 2021.
Say that to my bro who was made redundant at 29 with his life ahead of him...he comitted suicide as a result of a company who didn't give a [Poor language removed] about him..
You never gave a [Poor language removed] about the people you were sacking..
i have dealt with the fall out from your selfish attitude you are welcome to your retirement with your offshore ill gotten gains.
I have looked into the eyes of people who suffered from you and your company [Poor language removed]..
Rot in hell mate
....and in all of that self serving diatribe you never once answered the question about “complexity” which was your original objective.
Just what Hydek, Freidman and eventually Reagan and Thatcher wanted.
The concept of a job for life - or at least the reasonable chance of career security over a lifetime - is something that we need if we are going require people to have mortgages, to get into debt that requires a long time to pay back (student loans etc), for some businesses to invest in production in a particular area and so on.
Pete I think the point they are making is that you’ve made out how hard it was on *you* to make other people redundant.Gets asked a question, give an honest answer, get a shedload of abuse.....you’re welcome guys, but no more.....
No offence taken. Just sharing some insights from my line of work. We're facing a number of things that are almost certain. Firstly, we're living longer and so people entering the workforce today are almost certainly going to be working far longer than their parents. So the old "study>work>retire" model is quite probably not going to apply to them. I'm not even convinced it will apply to you and I, but lets be conservative and say our children. If people are working for 60 years with the pace that the world is moving today the idea that you'll do one thing for that entire time is highly unlikely.No offence bruce, but this is exactly the sort of tripe that has helped lead to Trump, Johnson and all the rest of the rubbish these past few years.
The concept of a job for life - or at least the reasonable chance of career security over a lifetime - is something that we need if we are going require people to have mortgages, to get into debt that requires a long time to pay back (student loans etc), for some businesses to invest in production in a particular area and so on.
If you want to have transferrable skills, flexible job markets, gig work (and all the rest of the things that sharp business minds use to cover up the fact that their competitive brilliance is mainly down to them no longer paying a fair rate of tax) then stuff like homes, transport, education and quite a few other things have to be provided to people. Businesses have to have areas where they can set up and operate, to allow their costs to be low enough to reasonably compete against giant firms who enjoy massive advantages.
Otherwise you just end up with an increasing number of people who can't afford to get a stake in society, whose economic future is bleak and who have every reason to vote against the people who think there isn't anything wrong. You end up with local businesses starting to fail, unable to compete against mega firms whose power, wealth and influence allow them to further cut costs, which has an impact on their employees and what rival businesses remain. Most importantly you end up with a government that has a perfect storm of lower taxes, increased welfare spending and much greater corruption because of the rewards on offer.
In short, you end up with the UK in 2021.
Pete I think the point they are making is that you’ve made out how hard it was on *you* to make other people redundant.
And how people could never understand because they’ve not been through it (the act of making people redundant).
When people are talking about the huge impact that redundancy itself can have on people’s lives. People have lost those close to them because of it.
To talk about the complexities of management is a bit trivial in comparison if I’m honest.
Yes I did, and I did it as well as I could. If you’ve never done it, you won’t know just how complex it is.....
They are not making a point at all. One asked a question and I already knew what his response would be, I should have ignored it, but that is now fixed. The second comment again was just to jump in ask about complexity, which is a very fair question and if asked I would have gone into detail, but no, he has to throw in a sly preamble, but like the former I’ll leave him to his own.
I was not even talking about the complexity of management which is something else again
I was talking about a situation which you have never experienced before and for which you have received no training and are faced with a myriad of people’s emotions...it’s complex....
Well first of all, making people redundancy is an aspect of management. But I don’t want to go into that. I’ll post the chain I read in order. And you lack empathy in this chain and miss a huge signal because, it seems to me, it was important to talk about yourself. It’s fine. I’m proud of myself and my achievements too, too proud at times. But this is quite stark and quite obviously painful and yet it was more important for you to ignore that and make it about yourself.They are not making a point at all. One asked a question and I already knew what his response would be, I should have ignored it, but that is now fixed. The second comment again was just to jump in ask about complexity, which is a very fair question and if asked I would have gone into detail, but no, he has to throw in a sly preamble, but like the former I’ll leave him to his own.
I was not even talking about the complexity of management which is something else again
I was talking about a situation which you have never experienced before and for which you have received no training and are faced with a myriad of people’s emotions...it’s complex....
Yes I did, and I did it as well as I could. If you’ve never done it, you won’t know just how complex it is.....
OK mate My family and friends have suffered from redundancy. Tell me how fecking complex it is please.
I’m sure I have explained this to you before.
No you haven't, why would I ask now?
Ok....
Well putting aside the mechanics, law, unions, payoffs, transfers, closure of a facility etc etc etc, there are the people. I have never made a person redundant who deserved it because of their own performance. It’s always been because of the incompetence of those they worked for.
The first time I had to close a plant down I was still in my twenties. I had lots of HR people advising and so on, but having to let hundreds go and relocate hundreds of others, I took the decision to speak to the whole plant as a group and then individually with every single person over the next four or five days. I could have delegated this to the line management and perhaps should have, but I’m glad I did it as it gave me an insight that many never see.
Now remember all of these people were good people, the vast majority highly qualified and experienced engineers. But every one of them sat in front of me to either be given the news that we were letting them go or were being retained and relocated elsewhere, if they wished.
Now put yourself in my position and imagine looking into the eyes of these men and women, most with families and mortgages and telling them you were letting them go. Each and every one of them having different issues and taking it in differing ways. Some very bullish and had jobs lined up, some desperate for work and in tears. That Is complex, and as you are lucky that you have never had to do it, don’t have a go at those who had to, just count your lucky stars.....
I’ll be honest Pete (and I’m conscious that this is a written medium and so difficult to see emotion and to empathise without that) , how you missed the wider issue I don’t know. I’m not sure why you thought talking about how hard and complex it is to tell people they are redundant is the appropriate response here. Your response was close to painting yourself as a victim. At the very least a martyr.Say that to my bro who was made redundant at 29 with his life ahead of him...he comitted suicide as a result of a company who didn't give a [Poor language removed] about him..
You never gave a [Poor language removed] about the people you were sacking..
i have dealt with the fall out from your selfish attitude you are welcome to your retirement with your offshore ill gotten gains.
I have looked into the eyes of people who suffered from you and your company [Poor language removed]..
Rot in hell mate
I’ll be honest Pete (and I’m conscious that this is a written medium and so difficult to see emotion and to empathise without that) , how you missed the wider issue I don’t know. I’m not sure why you thought talking about how hard and complex it is to tell people they are redundant is the appropriate response here. Your response was close to painting yourself as a victim. At the very least a martyr.
Well first of all, making people redundancy is an aspect of management. But I don’t want to go into that. I’ll post the chain I read in order. And you lack empathy in this chain and miss a huge signal because, it seems to me, it was important to talk about yourself. It’s fine. I’m proud of myself and my achievements too, too proud at times. But this is quite stark and quite obviously painful and yet it was more important for you to ignore that and make it about yourself.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.