peteblue
Welcome back Wayne
I always try to reply to posters, and no I’ve never had you on ignore.....
Current Affairs EU In or Out
- Thread starter micknick
- Start date
- Status
I always try to reply to posters, and no I’ve never had you on ignore.....
Soz, I know. Not one of my proudest moments but I didn't like Hillary and thought he would be a jolt to the American system. He was I guess, but in all the worst possible ways
tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
I didn't say leave voters were racist pete; I didn't even say you were because of your leave vote. I just thought it was remarkable you'd got on your high horse after saying quite a few things about the Irish.
That Varadkar stuff was quite something tbf. I'm putting it down to him being 10 pints deep and having a random pang of racist sentiment as opposed to being indicative of his general view of Irish people with foreign sounding names
She had the same 'kin deal mate. She just didn't shamble around making vague allusions to "sovereignty". You've been stitched up good and proper here, you just needed a good old Eton boy to sell you the beans
It's not even the end of it like it's being portrayed, as ongoing negotiations will occur on financial services and data, while all those committees will be engaged in various wranglings, before the whole thing is revisited again in five years time.
Think I'll stay out of Ireland's affairs.
Given the deal has now passed, were out of the EU, we've regained our Sovereignty (whatever people think that means), we've got a massive Tory majority in parliament, why are people lying about the details off the deal?
I can understand saying 'we don't know the possible outcome' of something, I can understand people voting for something which they know will make them financially poorer for the possibility of greater freedom and I can understand why people may dislike the incredibly bureaucratic EU structures and systems - but why there is a denial of clear legal agreement? If it's great deal, be proud of it, if it's done what it was supposed to do be proud of it, it's got many of the aims of what the UK wanted so be proud of it - if it's so good, I don't see why there is a reluctance to own the detail rather than just the headline.
I can understand saying 'we don't know the possible outcome' of something, I can understand people voting for something which they know will make them financially poorer for the possibility of greater freedom and I can understand why people may dislike the incredibly bureaucratic EU structures and systems - but why there is a denial of clear legal agreement? If it's great deal, be proud of it, if it's done what it was supposed to do be proud of it, it's got many of the aims of what the UK wanted so be proud of it - if it's so good, I don't see why there is a reluctance to own the detail rather than just the headline.
Diane Abbott. And Maths don't go together
We don't know the possible outcome of it yet! Not remainers. Not brexiteers. Maybe in 5 years. I'm sure the same arguments will still be in here
Nor do you and grammar.
Kev The Rat
Player Valuation: £70m
Most leave voters don’t like the deal so there’s that
Only 17% of Britons think Boris Johnson’s ‘fantastic’ Brexit deal is good for country
Just 27% of Leave voters say the agreement is a success – and only one in three Conservative supporters
www.independent.co.uk
There’s been a lot of talk about the 12 month notice termination clause - I would expect that to be the next Brexit battleground in months/years to come. The deal just agreed is simply marking time.
By the use of Nor you obviously agreed about Diane Abbott then
Didn't read my post properly did you...
- Status