So, listening to McDonnell on Marr's show just now re the LP position, it's a restatement of what Thornberry said on Question Time: go back and negotiate a deal with the EU (based on a better outcome for workers), then offer that with another choice of Remain in a 2nd referendum.
That's way too woolly and indecisive, and it doesn't reflect the LP membership or bulk of the PLP viewpoint. It wont stand a LP conference.
I understand Corbyn and McDonnell not wishing to reverse completeley the result of the 1st referendum, but that time has come and gone. There needs to be a binary choice between a firm Leave (which we almost have with Johnson and the Tories) and a firm Remain. This is not the time for advancing a position that requires a pivot attached to it. The political culture is way too unsophisticated and raw for that now. Anything short of a vigorous campaign on Remain for Labour will allow Johnson a clear path back into No.10.
I think Thornberry’s point the other night was excellent.....it was drowned out by the guffaws of that loudmouth Tory and the odious barrow boy, Tice.
The fact is there is no better deal available than the one we already enjoy.......i.e. full EU membership.
None whatsoever.
That cannot be improved upon.
So by definition, if Labour is tasked with brokering a deal it will be inferior to our current one.
I would imagine that would be very much the majority opinion among both the PLP and party members.
But as we need to try and put this madness to bed there will be a need to put it to the people in Referendum.
The choice would then be between a clearly defined Labour version of the Brexit deal or Remain.
With a Labour government campaigning against the deal it brokered.
That is what Thirnberry was saying and it made perfect sense to me


