Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't have figures, but instinctively I don't know why anyone would uproot themselves, especially from a relatively stable homeland (ie discounting warzones) to go somewhere where you have no home or job lined up. Instinctively that makes no sense at all.

But your instinct is based on someone who lives in a relatively prosperous nation.

I like the vision you have/want for the world. I’m actually on board with it. But I just don’t think it’s achievable in the current world we live in. I think it will take a cataclysmic event for us as a planet to even look towards setting things up right (I fully accept that Brexit isn’t the immediately progressive sociological path, but I do truly believe that the EU doesn’t work for a plethora of reasons.)
 
But your instinct is based on someone who lives in a relatively prosperous nation.

I like the vision you have/want for the world. I’m actually on board with it. But I just don’t think it’s achievable in the current world we live in. I think it will take a cataclysmic event for us as a planet to even look towards setting things up right (I fully accept that Brexit isn’t the immediately progressive sociological path, but I do truly believe that the EU doesn’t work for a plethora of reasons.)

For sure, I don't believe it will happen in my lifetime, and indeed, as I've mentioned before, the 'nationalism' leg of Rodrik's trifecta is experiencing a resurgence of late. I'm just not sure that's a good thing at all.
 
As an Economics graduate I would be interested to hear that you would be a proponent of Austerity.

My (laymans) understanding of it was that most Economists, including the IMF had decided that it fundamentally doesn’t work.

Please bear in mind I’ve not picked up a text book on macroeconomics for 10 years.

Tbh I believe in modelling called real business cycles, it works on the premise that economies go through boom and bust, and rather than trying to prevent the bust or increase the boom you look to lessen both in order to have a smoother upwards trend.

Given that there was excessive spending by new labour (including selling gold at a stupidly low price), we found ourselves in a period of excessive ‘bust’.

The IMF, IMO use dated modelling - and we can see this through the premise that most macro models show austerity policies generally increase unemployment as government spending falls. Now using the real world - Has unemployment grown?

I’d say no.
 
Oh I studied macroeconomics as part of my MSc Economics... tell me why austerity after a period of unsolicited spending and poor fiscal decisions is a bad idea. Are you a follower of classic models such as Keynesian or more modern models like real business cycle modelling?

You can be technical, or not. I’m ok with either.

Keynes, mostly.

As an Economics graduate I would be interested to hear that you would be a proponent of Austerity.

My (laymans) understanding of it was that most Economists, including the IMF had decided that it fundamentally doesn’t work.

Hear hear... I agree, the onus to explain falls on he whose ideas have caused the slowest recovery since the wars against Napoleon.
 
Keynes, mostly.



Hear hear... I agree, the onus to explain falls on he whose ideas have caused the slowest recovery since the wars against Napoleon.

Keynes?? Not the augmented Keynesian model, but the Keynesian models. Quite a dated model, even the BoE uses the augmented modelling system.

See previous post for explanation.
 
Oh I studied macroeconomics as part of my MSc Economics... tell me why austerity after a period of unsolicited spending and poor fiscal decisions is a bad idea. Are you a follower of classic models such as Keynesian or more modern models like real business cycle modelling?

You can be technical, or not. I’m ok with either.
As an Economics graduate I would be interested to hear that you would be a proponent of Austerity.

My (laymans) understanding of it was that most Economists, including the IMF had decided that it fundamentally doesn’t work.
Keynes, mostly.
Hear hear... I agree, the onus to explain falls on he whose ideas have caused the slowest recovery since the wars against Napoleon.

Like I’ve said before, you’ll never get three economists to agree about anything......
 
I Can’t see freedom of movement as a benefit, actually I see it as a racist policy that prefers white Christian immigration over non Eu immigration.

I have a family friend who has relatives who are pretty highly skilled, because they’re not from Romania but from Africa they’ve been rejected to come into the Uk, because of some arbitrary quotas and rules.

Access to the single market isn’t a benefit either, it’s a restriction of trade.
I too wear traditional Ghanaian robes on bank holidays
 
As an Economics graduate I would be interested to hear that you would be a proponent of Austerity.

My (laymans) understanding of it was that most Economists, including the IMF had decided that it fundamentally doesn’t work.
Mark Blyth (who predicted the 2008 CDO meltdown and global recession) has a great book called Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea.

Austerity was the absolute worst response the tories could have done, caused us to recover slower than most of the EU (not to mention the deaths, household debt and homelessness it brings)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top