Sky changing their tune massively now murdochs man is in power, apparently johnsons performance was superb according to them100% this. He was awful in the Commons just then. All bluster.
Sky changing their tune massively now murdochs man is in power, apparently johnsons performance was superb according to them100% this. He was awful in the Commons just then. All bluster.
Your right more to do with Germany not spending it's massive surplus thus neglecting it's public services and infrastructure projects, sounds familiar, should be it's called Austerity here in the UK...Can't be! They imported a million scientists and engineers not long ago.
Your right more to do with Germany not spending it's massive surplus thus neglecting it's public services and infrastructure projects, sounds familiar, should be it's called Austerity here in the UK...
Yep, of course, son has studied and/or worked in three non-EU countries. But it is an advantage and benefit to have that right as part of EU membership which means a lot to those who wish to exercise that right with out impacting negatively on those who do not wish to exercise it.And that’s fine, and my children and their spouses work in the USA, Saudi Arabia and the Philippines. There is a big world out there beyond the EU.......and strangely enough we do not need a political union with any of them......
That's like Brexiteer stating that the Norway deal with the EU is what Britain needs, you really cannot compare Norway to Germany, like you cannot compare Norway's deal with EU to want Britain can achieve...Norway don't spend their massive surplus either, and they seem to be doing alright. Either way, it's not really suitable to call it austerity, which is the act of reducing (often huge) budget deficits, and it's perhaps worth reminding people that throughout 'austerity', the government was still spending far more than it received. The economic definition of austerity merely requires spending to be going in a certain direction, so an 11% budget deficit one year, and 9% the next would see that second year classed as austere, despite the government still clearly spending way beyond its means. It's also perhaps worth remembering that the government has still spent more as a % of GDP during the 'austerity' years than they did during much of the Blair years, with the only real difference being that Blair was blessed with a growing economy, whereas Brown/Cameron were cursed with the biggest recession in a century.
To be honest it reminded me of Jim Hacker trying to impersonate Churchill in Yes Minister.Sky changing their tune massively now murdochs man is in power, apparently johnsons performance was superb according to them
That's like Brexiteer stating that the Norway deal with the EU is what Britain needs, you really cannot compare Norway to Germany, like you cannot compare Norway's deal with EU to want Britain can achieve...
Germany is another classic example of leaving it to free market to fill in which it has not and thus all its achieved is to energise wonky eyed populism, at home and here in the UK. Another fine mess neo-liberalism agenda has sown and now coming to fruition...Merely saying that having a budget surplus is not always a bad thing. Heaven knows, the British government are a long way from having one, and indeed have only had a handful in the last 40 years.
Germany is another classic example of leaving it to free market to fill in which it has not and thus all its achieved is to energise wonky eyed populism, at home and here in the UK. Another fine mess neo-liberalism agenda has sown and now coming to fruition...
Well the socialist party of France is about as socialist as the Fabians and Progress in Labour tbh, about as centre as you can get. Hence all the big splits in 2008 and Mélenchon leading the Left FrontSo German spending on infrastructure has risen due to its neo-liberalism, yet France under the socialist governance of Hollande saw infrastructure spending go down. Interesting analysis. Indeed, in the 5 years of the socialist presidency in France, 4 billion euros was stripped from infrastructure spending, whereas supposedly neo-liberal Germany saw there's go up by 1.5 billion euros. Even 'austerity' Britain managed to do better on infrastructure spending than socialist France.
Source: https://data.oecd.org/transport/infrastructure-investment.htm
Well the socialist party of France is about as socialist as the Fabians and Progress in Labour tbh, about as centre as you can get. Hence all the big splits in 2008 and Mélenchon leading the Left Front
That's very true. The PS wasn't really socialist, hence the formation of the coalition of the "Front de Gauche" and later "Insoumise".Well the socialist party of France is about as socialist as the Fabians and Progress in Labour tbh, about as centre as you can get. Hence all the big splits in 2008 and Mélenchon leading the Left Front
Well that's great then. They will have great experience of right wing,caring and 'democratic' regimes. They are sure to feel at home in a post Brexit England.And that’s fine, and my children and their spouses work in the USA, Saudi Arabia and the Philippines. There is a big world out there beyond the EU.......and strangely enough we do not need a political union with any of them......
Your being utterly churilsh with the truth similar to Swinson is a yellow Tory with voting record that would Esther Mcvey consider compassion...So German spending on infrastructure has risen due to its neo-liberalism, yet France under the socialist governance of Hollande saw infrastructure spending go down. Interesting analysis. Indeed, in the 5 years of the socialist presidency in France, 4 billion euros was stripped from infrastructure spending, whereas supposedly neo-liberal Germany saw there's go up by 1.5 billion euros. Even 'austerity' Britain managed to do better on infrastructure spending than socialist France.
Source: https://data.oecd.org/transport/infrastructure-investment.htm
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.