Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yep, and if May, et al, hadn't have been so greedy and hubristic, a lot more people who had voted remain would have been supportive.
I think May can lie blameless on Brexit prior to the referendum, although she has to shoulder blame post referendum as PM. She's been stubborn and isolated from her own government and parliament.
 
Giving the people a vote on an issue is not undemocratic. The people then deciding to take a decision which the establishment disagrees with does not make it undemocratic either!

That is a misnomer. Most of the 'establishment' want Brexit, even at no deal. Much more likely that the newer MPs with working class backgrounds are the ones trying to stop it.
 
Yes but one of the reasons is that you have quite a large population. If you change it to per capita, it's different. Changes a lot really; and depending on what you read Brexit will cost 35-102 € extra/year/citizen over here. That's nothing compared to all the taxes we're paying so I'm really not bothered; and the financial transfers to all the other regions etc... In 2016 you paid 90 €/a capita. That's the equivalent of a concert ticket for Leonard Cohen (when he was alive obviously). A Belgian paid 109 €. The financial argument never really does it for me. I prefer they make the whole organisation more efficient/fairer; and then I'm very willing to pay more.

It will probably be more in the high end of the estimate of the number above; since they are planning an increase in expenditures for the fight against terrorism, climate change, science, and border security.
I recall us having this same discussion before mate. I'm talking about net contribution. We only get back approx one third of our gross contribution in the form of grants/subsidies etc. That is less than any other nation, with only Germany coming close. So when you say that a relationship should be give and take, and in the UK's case it's always take, that's not strictly true is it.
 
I stated pages back Brexit would never happen, or indeed a mishmash Brexit that would be more costly than being in the current EU -
LBC stated this am 60 percent of MPs are remainers, hence the deadlock - plus a biased. Speaker who is an avid Remainer....
We started off with a leader who had been uselessi n the home office a secret remainer who has bundled a deal together that is so bad it's far worse than being in the EU ....not just the backstop do people realise if the UK signed up to that deal for free trade it has to not undercut any present EU trade deals?
Then free movement in the deal is it really practical or fair to anyone from the EU to come here would be to earn £26,000 plus?
Then we have last nights votes a majority of one - passed by a MPwho wore a prison tag,which ever way that vote went - I remember MPs fighting to stop prisoners from not having the vote in general....
Yet this MP was allowed to leave prison with a tag ?
Double standards?
What Brexit has shown is MPs have not changed much since they were caught fiddling there expenses....
I as a voter would like to leave the EU with a decent Parliment with a good deal - this I am afraid is if we do leave it will be under very poor circumstances, and democracy has bit the dust which in the next GE should be the chance to get rid of the bouncers of MPs that ignored a democratic vote with the highest post war turn out....
 
Brexit is finished. Once it was postponed, and it will be 'postponed' again, the game was up. The first postponement was a dry run, the next one will be for 12 months. There will be elections to the EU then in 12 months people will, not unreasonably, say that it's been 4 years since the referendum and people will be clamouring for a re-run. All the leavers know that they would have no chance in a second referendum which is why they're running scared
They should've planned to win it tbh, and then they should have actually had a workable plan for leaving instead of just screaming brexit means brexit and a red white and blue brexit for 3 years
 
I stated pages back Brexit would never happen, or indeed a mishmash Brexit that would be more costly than being in the current EU -
LBC stated this am 60 percent of MPs are remainers, hence the deadlock - plus a biased. Speaker who is an avid Remainer....
We started off with a leader who had been uselessi n the home office a secret remainer who has bundled a deal together that is so bad it's far worse than being in the EU ....not just the backstop do people realise if the UK signed up to that deal for free trade it has to not undercut any present EU trade deals?
Then free movement in the deal is it really practical or fair to anyone from the EU to come here would be to earn £26,000 plus?
Then we have last nights votes a majority of one - passed by a MPwho wore a prison tag,which ever way that vote went - I remember MPs fighting to stop prisoners from not having the vote in general....
Yet this MP was allowed to leave prison with a tag ?
Double standards?
What Brexit has shown is MPs have not changed much since they were caught fiddling there expenses....
I as a voter would like to leave the EU with a decent Parliment with a good deal - this I am afraid is if we do leave it will be under very poor circumstances, and democracy has bit the dust which in the next GE should be the chance to get rid of the bouncers of MPs that ignored a democratic vote with the highest post war turn out....
If that was the case though, revoking article 50 would have passed through parliament with a 60-40 majority..
 
I understand your frustration mate, but still a large proportion of the population is unhappy and they want change and they think this is a good idea so their wishes must be enacted. Preferably in such a way that they can't blame the EU if their life doesn't improve. That's why I'm a bit sceptical about very soft Brexits (off course you have every right to pursue such a thing), but I can practically guarantee the content of the tabloids if such a construction comes into being. I think it's a bit of pipe-dream to see the UK as a potential force of reform tbh. One leg in, one out. Always been the case, can't see that changing suddenly. Usually only for strictly market related subjects; like the patents (credit where credit is due). That's not what we need atm. There are relatively good blue prints about for a better EU; almost all require a bit of extra federalism- not something the UK has traditionally supported.

I think with the rise of populism in the UK, it's inevitable that the EU will be seen by many as the bad guys. This is a notion is shared by both the well educated and the ignorant. The only difference is the well educated can back up their theories with flowery words.

It does look at the moment that we are headed toward a very soft brexit. As a remainer I can accept this through gritted teeth so long as freedom of movement is maintained (thats my red line). As you say the soft Brexit will give further voice to the hard brexiteers who will inevitably point the finger in the direction of Brussels, when the blame lies firmly and squarely with the UK Govt. I think its unavoidable that the UK's exit from the EU will create unrest within the 27 member states with Italy and Poland voicing their displeasure with the EU.

Btw I still can't get over the fact that the Dutch voted in large numbers for this idiot, I know they have a tradition of voting for extravagant populists but still. The only thing he does is use 'difficult' words (oikophobia...), occasionally recites Greek literature, well generally just being a pompous arse tbh... And then some people go: "hmm I"m going to vote him". And all the while he's just spouting nonsense like: climate change isn't real, general misogyny, his issues with masturbation because apparently it does something bad with the male energy ... He's just a slightly polished Wilders.

Yeah it's a concern for sure. Baudet is as you say a highly polished Wilders. He shares the same visions, speaks the same mantra he just dresses things up more (speaking in Latin, quoting pre 19th century literature, etc...). Kinda reminds me of Jacob Rees Mogg.

I think he preys on the insecurity of the dutch people, pandering to their concerns on immigration, not so much that the immigrants are taking dutch jobs but more that dutch culture is being watered down by the influx of other cultures who are slow to adopt the dutch way of life, language and culture.

He and his party are working with the very real splits in dutch society and in doing so are appealing to voters on both sides of the barriers. To the well educated "elites" and also to the poorly educated and low paid. We saw exactly the same populist principles applied to the UK Brexit leave campaign with stunning success and I think we can expect more of this throughout Europe. In short Brexit or no Brexit, the EU have a very difficult road to walk in the next 5 years.
 
Last edited:
Giving the people a vote on an issue is not undemocratic. The people then deciding to take a decision which the establishment disagrees with does not make it undemocratic either!

Leavers were not less educated than remainers. Some were more well informed than others of course, but name me a vote or election in history where this has not been the case. No one was duped. No one cheated. The public voted. Over 30m people. We aren't a democracy if we choose to ignore that. A second referendum removes the legitimacy of every future vote taken in this country as the precedent is there to ensure there is another vote, if the political class aren't happy with the outcome. It's a matter of principal.

I ask remainers.... if it had been 52-48 in the opposite direction, would we still be having discussions repeatedly about overturning a democratic decision to remain?
Agree with that Tim, but as regards your final question, then I'm pretty certain that the campaign to leave the EU would actually have gathered strength after the referendum. Had leave been the "48%" they would have taken that as a full on mandate to carry on their campaign.

It's why I believe revoking article 50 or having a people's vote won't resolve anything going forward. If anything it will make the leave contingent even more determined and the country more polarised. The UK could become a very toxic place to live, work and invest.
 
No, of course not.
The ERG, the rest of the right wing of the Tories, Farage, UKIP would have said;
"Oh well, fair enough".


Indeed, Al.

Mr. Farage had made clear his intentions to accept defeat gracefully :)




Nigel Farage: Narrow Remain win may lead to second referendum


There could be unstoppable demand for a re-run of the EU referendum if Remain wins by a narrow margin on 23 June, UKIP leader Nigel Farage has said.
 
This really. The massive number of people watching them regurly has really exposed the whole thing for the antiquated, old boys club sham that it is. It was one thing when the only people watching the the House of Commons was a the small number of political anoraks but that's all changed due to Brexit. Everyone has seen for themselves what an utter joke our system is and how unfit for purpose it is in 2019. The endless juvenile shouting at each other infuriates me beyond beliefs as does all the pathetic little game-like rituals the simpletons play as they make decisions that affect people's lives and rights!
I think what did it for me was the sight of Rees-Mogg on his feet in the Commons and carrying on banter with another MP concerning their rival public schools.

The sheer audacity of it beggars belief.
 
It's debatable really. I think you could make a legitimate case to say that Austerity coupled with 'populist' agendas and a desire for Libertarianism among Tory ranks, leading to the referendum, was a much greater, and continue s to be a greater threat to UK democracy.

A practice of 'backsliding' as described below, begins the process:

Far-right and Anti Immigration rhetoric on social media and in the press has consistently targeted individual rights (Human Rights Act, Equality Act). Where this becomes popular perception, individual freedoms are at risk. The Brexit process will inevitably have a negative impact on individual rights. UK citizens will lose all rights derived from EU citizenship, including free movement in EU member states. Not just free movement but all rights derived from the EU Charter:

The charter only operates within the scope of EU membership, so won't be relevant in the event of No Deal.

In respect if the referendum itself. By giving so much credibility to a (relativeky speaking) slim majority vote in an advisory referendum (although I accept it is now considered legally bindin), where the campaigns were subject to criticism for the lack of informed debate and uncertain positions, the government is pursuing a mandate that is unclear in its terms, meaning and consequences.

Whatever people like Rees-Mogg and @peteblue might say, people clearly didn't vote for No Deal en masse; they voted for a reaction to the status quo and against the 'status quo' championed by Cameron and Osborne. They voted for anything and everything that was falsely promised by Leave campaingers.

A vote for a speculative and vague position is a vote in support of anything and, therefore nothing at all. The oroblem, as I've alluded to previously in the thread is that Executive action taken under an unclear mandate weakens the authority of Parliament (and the Democracy of the UK). Defaulting to a No Deal is a Political and Democratic failure, as the public by and large cannot easily predict what comes next.

Equally, Leave campaingers knowingly offering the unfeasible (however attractive to the average voter) diminishes the public choice. Voting to implement a form of Brexit that was promised but is ultimately legally unfeasible is meaningless. Likewise, without public consideration of the current options available, knowing that the legal position in a binding vote would've been a voiding of the result, it too diminishes the Democratic process as you cannot practically deliver what was promised.


I didn’t vote for no deal. I voted to leave. I expected a deal to be done, but I still want to leave. If there is a choice between a deal that keeps us in the Eu then I would vote no deal. Simple really.....
 
I honestly don't know how both parties are going to play it. May has her deal but its universally disliked, so does she offer a no deal? I cant see that. Buty, actually, didn't she promise to step down before the next election?

Who knows ? She also said no deal is better than a bad deal. The speaker said he was going to step down and didn’t. I don’t believe a word any of them say.....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top