You're language throughout that post highlights your contempt towards people with children who struggle to provide for them.
My original point, before I picked up on the guy who mentioned the kids aspect, was aimed at the division of the working class in this country. Divide and conquer at its best, and what is being displayed in your post. We are told the problem lies with those living off benefits, having too many children, and the rest of it.
There is a reason for these things happening, and everybody is a product of their environment. I stand by what I said, the most vulnerable are being blamed for many of societies wrong doings.
Stop talking about me as a person, or the language I used. That's an ad hominem attack, focus on what I actually said instead.
I have zero problem with the working class, I've been working class my entire life. I'm not talking about the working class here. When you're talking about people having children they can't afford you're talking about people who are doing so to rely on the income provided by the child benefit.
You can be working class and still afford to raise kids, my parents did it so did lots of others. The original post which you called disgusting was, in my opinion, a fair commentary about the type of people who solely seek to procreate for the purpose of increasing their child benefit and have no real ability to support their children properly.
An increase in child allowance should not be a reason to have another child, but for some people it is and those people are scroats and leeches. Not the average Joe and Jane who need a bit of help to get by, but those families on estates with 6 or 7 kids that are not being properly looked after.
You can turn around and point the finger at the ills of society all you want, those people still made a choice to have a child they can't afford and that is wrong. Just like how growing up in poverty doesn't excuse you for becoming a criminal, you still had to make the choice.