So if somebody links an on line poll you don't agree with you'll have it removed.
Which one of you is the real John Burcowlol
@GrandOldTeam I think. We take it in turns being Sally.
So if somebody links an on line poll you don't agree with you'll have it removed.
Which one of you is the real John Burcowlol
To protect the all island economy with both parts of Ireland being in it. If NI left the Single Market there there would be differing standards which would necessitate the need for border checks.Ha ha. Fair enough mate.
Actually I had googled it first and the statement above looks remarkably similar to one of the responses I got
The thing is, none of them gave me the answer I was looking for, which is why I asked for clarification from somebody I thought might have known the answer. I'm still no wiser as I still don't understand why Northern Ireland had to be members of the both the Customs Union and the single market in the backstop.
Most leave voters would still vote leave despite being 2 years on and having the facts in front of them so not really true that they were to dumb to understand what they were voting for
The EU never put a word in the leave documents that no majority in the UK will vote for.....
Liverpool voted to Remain Bruce ......hardly surprising this forum is lent towards Remain .....including not much impartiality as I kindly pointed out to you...We're just abiding by the will of the GOT people, for whom 65% want to remain so we're doing democracy, taking back control and something or other.
Hardly their fault that there is only 1 computer per village and they have to go to night classes to learn how to use it before trying to sign the petition.
Ground-Hog May, that you?Liverpool voted to Remain Bruce ......hardly surprising this forum is lent towards Remain .....including not much impartiality as I kindly pointed out to you...
It's nearly 3000 pages long it's been taken down once as tempers ran high - at the end of the day it's sadly in down to our elected MP, and what a dogs dinner they have all made of it - we needed a strong Brexit leader to form a good trade deal,and not offer 39 billion Euros up first........
Not sure I entirely agree with this. The backstop involves the whole of the UK being in the customs union so enjoying all the benefits of free trade etc but without freedom of movement. This is something the EU has repeatedly said isn't available so they will want to avoid the backstop every much as we do. IMO
God no, this is massive issue because they want to total separation from the EU. No alignment to their rules or regulations which they believe is the same if you follow single set of rules.Isn't that what most leavers want. Some sort of free trade deal, with the right to negotiate deals with other nations and without freedom of movement of people. We need to comply with EU standards, but as they are currently our standards too what's the big issue. If they change standards in the future then we cross that bridge at the time. TBH, I can't foresee any changes so bad that will mean us giving up free trade with the EU
Basically, the UK would not be allowed to apply tariffs on EU fish being imported into the UK, but EU would on UK fish being imported into the Union. They will waive this if they are given access to our fishing watersNot sure this is written properly. Can you clarify.
Again, as above people who for leave (and those like ERG) see this has interference once again by Europe.OK. I understand why this would be an issue. But is it worth holding up Brexit for even putting Brexit at threat (obviously I'm referring to people who voted leave here)? Somebody, somewhere has to have a final say on judicial matters. In our law now, as it stands, the ECJ is the highest court. There has to be some sort of concession if we're going to make Brexit happen.
Barnier stated it was a leave treaty as it's nearly 600 pages long - the fact the other 27 members could not wait to sign it .... gave people in the UK the clue it's a bad deal - the trade deal was 8 pages it's a cart before the horse scenario......What has that strange rant got to do with you think its a treaty?
17.4m people voting is pointless if you can't agree how you all want to do it.Unless it gets to 17.4Million who cares......
Sorry are you being facetious or are you trying to defend your point?I was being facetious mate. You need to try it sometime. Oh what's that? You already havelol
As regards the membership fee, it's absolutely true that the UK have a lower percentage of this directly redistributed back to the UK (approx. one third) than any other of the EU27. Added to this is that in comparison to the UK membership fee (roughly 15% of the total EU budget) the EU employs relatively few UK citizens (around 4%) and has even fewer positions domiciled within the UK (around 1%). So you can understand why many people would have the opinion that it could be construed as a donation.
And before you come back at me, yes I do fully understand that there are other intangible benefits to our being in the EU, but that is also true of every other EU member, no?
quite interesting that people from a city renowned for being the biggest dump and full of crims in the country would [Poor language removed] off other areas.
When in fact none of it is true.
So knock it off
Who the hell asked you?
You better wind your neck in pal.
What an idiotic comment. These places are the heartlands of misinformed comments every where from the daily mail to the BBC. Without the work of these noble savages you’d be able to read a comments page without feeling better about yourselfHardly their fault that there is only 1 computer per village and they have to go to night classes to learn how to use it before trying to sign the petition.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.