Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
@Bruce Wayne

Which leads me to my last point. You totally ignored my comment that the Govt has said it will bring in a new scheme to replace the EU scheme from 2021. The Stronger Towns Fund is completely independent of this and is not designed as a replacement for the EU funding. So do you agree that the tweet you posted was misleading in this regard?
Cat got your tongue?:)
 
@Bruce Wayne


Cat got your tongue?:)

I don't believe there has been any government announcement that the Stronger Towns Fund is merely an aperitif to a much larger project to support towns left behind that will not only match existing EU funding but surpass it. Do by all means link me up though, or otherwise accept that this government are complete turds who are unlikely to do anything you suggest.
 
I don't believe there has been any government announcement that the Stronger Towns Fund is merely an aperitif to a much larger project to support towns left behind that will not only match existing EU funding but surpass it. Do by all means link me up though, or otherwise accept that this government are complete turds who are unlikely to do anything you suggest.
As a self confessed technophobe I'm not particularly good at linking things. Luckily my mate Jebus has done it for me.;)

Fully understand that. Happy to help.
The last 3 headings of this article might be useful too:

This is actually one of the websites I got my information from, and obviously the fact that Jebus has also linked it shows it has his endorsement too.
 
Of course. Did you?

Yes. Nowhere did it say that funding would be matched. It said in the event of no deal the UK would support those projects that have already begun, and that a review would take place as to any future support. As the EU funding cycle is up until 2027, that's inevitably going to leave a lot of places that could have received support in limbo.

Incidentally, the article says a public consultation was supposed to have happened last autumn. I welcome your input on what the outcome of this review was.
 
Yes. Nowhere did it say that funding would be matched. It said in the event of no deal the UK would support those projects that have already begun, and that a review would take place as to any future support. As the EU funding cycle is up until 2027, that's inevitably going to leave a lot of places that could have received support in limbo.

Incidentally, the article says a public consultation was supposed to have happened last autumn. I welcome your input on what the outcome of this review was.
I never said it would be matched. As regards the highlighted bit, you've just made that up. The article actually says

"The Conservative manifesto for the 2017 General Election pledged to create a “United Kingdom Shared Prosperity Fund” to replace Structural Funds with a UK funding system. This Fund would be intended to reduce inequality between communities across the four nations and to deliver sustainable, inclusive growth."

I only ever claimed that the tweet you posted was comparing the £1.6b being paid out under the Stronger Towns Fund, with the E13b that we would have received under the EU structural fund, strongly implying that one is to directly replace the other. This is both misleading and inaccurate, but for some reason you seem unwilling to agree to this. Why? .

As regards the public consultation, I admire your attempt to deflect the question. I don't know is the honest answer. I assume that when they made that statement they expected to be a lot further along with the Brexit negotiations. Even now we have no idea what is going to happen so any discussions held last Autumn would have been futile anyway. Plus they had better things to do with their time.
 
I never said it would be matched. As regards the highlighted bit, you've just made that up. The article actually says

"The Conservative manifesto for the 2017 General Election pledged to create a “United Kingdom Shared Prosperity Fund” to replace Structural Funds with a UK funding system. This Fund would be intended to reduce inequality between communities across the four nations and to deliver sustainable, inclusive growth."

I only ever claimed that the tweet you posted was comparing the £1.6b being paid out under the Stronger Towns Fund, with the E13b that we would have received under the EU structural fund, strongly implying that one is to directly replace the other. This is both misleading and inaccurate, but for some reason you seem unwilling to agree to this. Why? .

As regards the public consultation, I admire your attempt to deflect the question. I don't know is the honest answer. I assume that when they made that statement they expected to be a lot further along with the Brexit negotiations. Even now we have no idea what is going to happen so any discussions held last Autumn would have been futile anyway. Plus they had better things to do with their time.

Because those are the two figures we know for certain are in place as of today. There 'might' be more money going to those places via an as yet illusory Shared Prosperity Fund that neither exists or has anything close to 13bn in it. There's an admirable attempt to defend a government that is largely indefensible. They clearly didn't have better things to do than to create this Stronger Towns Fund, yet when the bung has had its affect, maybe they will find the time in their busy schedule to do something they pledged to do several months ago. Or maybe not. After all, why support places that never vote Tory anyway.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top