Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've no idea to be honest. The Ireland issue doesn't really interest me a great deal so I couldn't tell you the first thing about it.
So basically, you are totally against the May deal even though you have no idea what it involves because it doesn't really interest you. Otherwise read as, I only want remain and to hell with everything else.

I wouldn't have a problem with that if you didn't go on so much about "no deal Brexit". If we do end up with a no deal Brexit (which I personally don't think we will) it will be as much the blame of the Remainer MPs as it would the Tory hard liners.
 
It's hard to interpret the meaning here when there is a complete lack of grammar. I'm not being condescending here, but it's hard to reply properly when I don't actually known what I'm supposed to be answering.

  • I post a lot: good for the forum I think. It's certainly good for an informed debate.
  • I agree with @Bruce Wayne on remain, but we do seem to differ on our stance re: second referendum and motives for Leave
  • Everyone draws their own conclusion, it's a necessary function in debate. However, some do it from an informed position with evidence, while others just offer opinion apropos of nothing.
ask @COYBL25. He's pretty good on Joey speak.;)
 
So basically, you are totally against the May deal even though you have no idea what it involves because it doesn't really interest you. Otherwise read as, I only want remain and to hell with everything else.

I wouldn't have a problem with that if you didn't go on so much about "no deal Brexit". If we do end up with a no deal Brexit (which I personally don't think we will) it will be as much the blame of the Remainer MPs as it would the Tory hard liners.

May's deal isn't a deal, as the video aptly explained. That is largely still to be negotiated. It covers the Irish backstop, which isn't really something that interests me a great deal. This is merely the first part of a long journey, with the Irish border the main sticking point.

Opponents to the deal have disagreed with the backstop, but also the fact that for the 2 year negotiating window, Britain would abide by rules it has no say in. Of course that would be nice, but I've never regarded the EU as out to shaft us like most Brexiters so the sovereignty argument was never an issue for me. I'm also not sure what people really expected to be any different?

It also covers the final 'divorce settlement', which again, if Britain is to maintain any kind of international reputation should, and is as per the May deal, a foregone conclusion.

By all means check it out for yourself though - https://assets.publishing.service.g..._and_the_European_Atomic_Energy_Community.pdf
 
OK.

What happens if leave wins again? Would you want another one. And if remain wins, won't the Brexiteers be within their democratic rights to demand a third referendum seeing as you set a precedent with the second. Where do you think it will all end?.

Do you see the problem with another referendum, whatever the outcome it isn't gong to bring the closure some people expect. In my opinion anyway.
Honestly? It's ok by me. It is how democracy ought to work if we are not leaving it to the elected representatives to decide. I don't think those who campaigned for 40 years to leave the EEC and EU regarded the 1975 referendum as decisive, did they? It should end with political parties standing for leave or remain - to accept or reject whatever is what HMG says is the best deal available, or to take the Russian roulette no deal option - and that's your lot.
 
I'm not saying they have been equally at fault, but they can't be totally exonerated either.

They could have prevented the referendum altogether had they shown more sympathy/empathy to Cameron's request for concessions. From memory what he was asking for wasn't that excessive. The problem was, I think, nobody expected the people to vote to leave. Had they thought this was a real threat I'm sure they would have been more accommodating.

Secondly their insistence on sorting out the divorce settlement first before even starting discussing on future agreements. Even if they didn't want to discuss together there's absolutely no reason why they couldn't have been holding separate talks simultaneously.

Also, some of the comments and statements coming from senior European politicians have stoked the ill feeling that many Britains towards the EU.

These are just off the top of my head mate. As I say, I'm not trying to lay all of the blame with them.

I honestly don't see why they should have offered extra concessions to Cameron when he couldn't even be bothered to implement the current rules to begin with. Always concessions/opt-outs etc, people are/were very tired of the constant British particularism. Sometimes enough is enough. I dare you; pick out a random European regulation and try and see if there is a British opt-out or similar. Now he wanted concessions for his party politics etc. The referendum (or something similar) was predicted, some just didn't want to see it. The backstop is a good deal btw; a lot of things in there that aren't exactly in the interest of the E.U either - so dragging it out isn't very likely. Those senior European politicians were just translating what people are thinking. Come on now, if you're confronted with people who lie/display various degrees of incompetence during a long period of time you're going to say something crude too.

And this is coming from a European; borderline federalist. I'm going to London tomorrow, if somebody there asks me what I think about Brexit I'm going to say something similar (remain isn't sustainable/there is no broad support for that/pick another option). Seriously no hard feelings, but it just wouldn't work.
 
As people have asked for a brief version of the withdrawal agreement, the ever useful Commons library have obliged.

 
I've no idea to be honest. The Ireland issue doesn't really interest me a great deal so I couldn't tell you the first thing about it.
Surprised to hear this from an ardent Remainer as it is the only reason why Brexit hasn't been agreed yet.

'Maintaining cross-border cooperation, supporting the all-island economy and protecting the Good Friday peace agreement.'

Those are the reasons why it is an even bigger deal for us in Ireland than it is for you in the UK.
 
Surprised to hear this from an ardent Remainer as it is the only reason why Brexit hasn't been agreed yet.

'Maintaining cross-border cooperation, supporting the all-island economy and protecting the Good Friday peace agreement.'

Those are the reasons why it is an even bigger deal for us in Ireland than it is for you in the UK.

For sure, I get that it's a big deal for many, but I'm a pacifist by nature so never really got why there was such angst between the two communities in the first place. That's not to say it's not a big deal, it's just not something I've focused limited time on exploring in depth. Israel and Palestine is another. I think being in the EU offers us a vast amount, and if it contributes towards peace in Ireland as well then that's great, but it's not my main reason for believing we're better off in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top