imagine a EU army it would take 20 odd parliaments weeks to decide what to do with it, most wars would be over by the time they made there minds up and half them would change sides if the going got tough going on past records.We're not a United States of Europe though, are we? On the army point, I can sympathise to a large extent. On one hand Germany has a pacifist constitution forced upon them after the war, and most would support that, yet they're largely criticised now for not pulling their weight militarily, and what's more that by piggy backing on the defence of others, they've been able to spend the money to good effect elsewhere. Yet if they started investing in their army and pushing their weight around I don't suppose it would be long before Kaiser references were made. An EU army would also help states like Italy and Greece that are bearing the burden of managing the refugee situation.
It's one of those things that in many ways probably makes sense, just as a 'UN army' makes sense in many situations, but just as having joint UN forces doing stuff hasn't diminished from national armies, I doubt that an 'EU army' would either. It's just a shame that many people are happy to play dumb and overlook the obvious in order to score points.
Russians would be in Brussels before they got around to voting.