These are my exact words...
so your statement was not inspired whatsoever by the Italian interior minister saying the EU were trying to swindle Britain? Give over.These are my exact words...
so your statement was not inspired whatsoever by the Italian interior minister saying the EU were trying to swindle Britain? Give over.Corbyn hopefullyBy October when May gets nowhere with her proposals we will have a Brexit leader.......

I would blame the EU Commission, certainly, for not even following its own processes...
“Article 50...
2. A Member State which decides to withdraw shall notify the European Council of its intention. In the light of the guidelines provided by the European Council, the Union shall negotiate and conclude an agreement with that State, setting out the arrangements for its withdrawal, taking account of the framework for its future relationship with the Union. That agreement shall be negotiated in accordance with Article 218(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. It shall be concluded on behalf of the Union by the Council, acting by a qualified majority, after obtaining the consent of the European Parliament.”
At present the Union are neither negotiating, nor taking account of the framework for the UK’s future relationship with the Union.
The implications of a no deal do not particularly worry me....
lol so your statement was not inspired whatsoever by the Italian interior minister saying the EU were trying to swindle Britain? Give over.
As far as the country goes. Who’s fault it would be if we got that position would be largely irrelevant. So let’s park that debate and agree to disagree.
I’m much more interested as to why leaving with absolutely no deal doesn’t particularly worry you?
I’m yet to read a single thing (that is backed up with evidence and research, rather than ‘feeling’, that doesn’t present this as really not very good at all)
This article from Friday for example lays out how food transportation could be affected.
http://politics.co.uk/blogs/2018/07/27/this-is-what-no-deal-brexit-actually-looks-like
Please - if you have read something, that explains how no deal would not significantly alter our supply chains, do share.
The spectator article from last year that was floating around yesterday, was light in detail and also contained this segment:
“‘No deal’ — trading with the EU with no FTA — is an entirely coherent position. It is very different from just ‘walking away’, which means failing to settle administrative issues such as mutual recognition agreements on exports. No one is advocating such an approach.”
Well that is precisely what is being spoken about now in terms of no-deal. A crash out with non of the administrative issues settled.
Which is why it seems to me to be kind of insane to not be even slightly concerned?
I have asked Remainers in the past to link me to even one article that spells out the issues for the EU, without success.
As I’ve said previously, with other posters, the type of reports and articles quoted only ever look at it from the effect upon the U.K. even though we know that the effects upon the EU will be similar if not more so. I have asked Remainers in the past to link me to even one article that spells out the issues for the EU, without success. I believe that a report was even produced by the department for exiting the EU identifying the problems that a no deal scenario would bring to the EU, but that our remainer loving civil servant Olly Robbins refused to even raise it with the EU. However, European governments know how they will be affected, some far more so than others, and they will either address this issue via the EU Council or they will suffer whatever we suffer. I am not worried about a no deal, firstly because there won’t be one, there will be some kind of fudge. But, even if one were to happen, our businesses, and those of our colleagues on the other side of the channel, have more than enough time to prepare and make suitable arrangements. Administrative issues will no doubt have already been covered and merely require political confirmation. The political game is still being played and will continue until the 11th hour in order to gain concessions......
I agree that no deal will not be allowed to happen but it seems like an easy response from those on the leave side to just play down the consequences of one by implying that it will be fairly straight forward to come to some arrangements.
The problem with the notion of a 'no deal' for both the UK and EU is that it requires extra attention that reduces the efficiency in progression towards a stable deal for both. You know full well the back up plans in the event of a no deal will require a lot of attention and planning so it's not as easy as you're trying to claim.
This smacks of "we voted to leave, and if it turns out crap, it's your fault for not implementing it properly." You and others like you wanted this Pete, yet you've shown nary a scrap of evidence or insight as to what this will look like, why it will be a good thing, or how it will benefit the parts of the country that voted to leave. Not a bean, so you'll have to forgive my incredulity when you try and accuse remain voters of a lack of research. Either that or you're the biggest wind up since Chico.
This smacks of "we voted to leave, and if it turns out crap, it's your fault for not implementing it properly." You and others like you wanted this Pete, yet you've shown nary a scrap of evidence or insight as to what this will look like, why it will be a good thing, or how it will benefit the parts of the country that voted to leave. Not a bean, so you'll have to forgive my incredulity when you try and accuse remain voters of a lack of research. Either that or you're the biggest wind up since Chico.
That's exactly what they like to do. They voted for a simple leave without having to specify the conditions that would have to be met to get the type of 'leave' arrangement they want. This is because there can't possibly be an easily agreed leave process as they all want different things that can't be implemented due to the conflicting impact of one thing on the other.
Norway and Switzerland for example get mentioned as a model to follow but this idea falls down on immigration due to the arrangement they had to make with the EU with the movement of people. This then goes against the basis of what a significant amount of leave voters voted for and yet a lot of those same leave voters will still throw in Norway and Switzerland to try and boost their argument (or have done in the past). Farage being a notable example.
Incredible isn’t it.They didn't force the four freedoms on us, they were voted on and the British government supported them. FFS, I've never in my life heard as much wilful ignorance as in this thread.
It merely highlights the total nonsense that is Brexit. People like you batting away the very real issues around medicines, food supplies, logistics chains etc etc, as being ‘doable’. Whilst failing to appreciate the complete fallacy and utter pointlessness of a no deal exit. We’ll have generators bobbing around in the Irish Sea, we won’t have a single trade deal with anyone and 759 treaties will have gone in the bin.I’m sorry if I seem to be downplaying the consequences or implying that it will be fairly straight forward to come to arrangements. I agree that a ‘no deal’ will require more work and more cost in planning and executing, but this is a one off. I’m not really saying it’s easy, it’s complicated, but it’s all doable.....
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.