Given that we're kinda pressed for time, and you (and others) made it quite clear that leave campaigners weren't required to have a thought out plan whilst campaigning to leave, are you happy with the progress the government has made in that time?
Let me correct you (once again...!), Bruce. Jeez, you do post some crap about what I have supposed to have posted in this thread!!!
First of all, there is a difference between the 'Leave' and 'Remain' campaigns on the one hand, and the Government of the day on the other.
The Referendum was a cross-party event, as you well know Bruce.
It was the responsibility of the two campaigns to put the case forward for their side. NOTHING MORE.
It was the responsibility of the Government to implement the decision made by the population of the UK on 23rd June last year. The roles of the two campaigns ceased at midnight 22nd June. There was no executive responsibility for either campaign to come up with an implementation plan, should the vote be to leave the EU. Their role was to campaign - period. Cameron, as PM, failed lamentably in his duties in not having any kind implementation plan in place or the preparation thereof in progress on 24th June when the result was announced. He resigned.
The matters of campaigning and implementation are two separate and distinct things - the one cannot cut across the other (although Cameron used £9 million of taxpayer's money to try to do so). You do not seem to be able to grasp this simple premise, Bruce...