Current Affairs EU In or Out

In or Out

  • In

    Votes: 688 67.9%
  • Out

    Votes: 325 32.1%

  • Total voters
    1,013
Status
Not open for further replies.
So, we had a referendum, we voted Leave, we had a vote in Parliament to enact article 50 by the end of march which was carried, we had a vote in Parliament to enact article 50 and by 494 to 122 it was carried without amendment. It will now go to the Lords where it will be accepted. So finally, will the remainers on here get behind our country or will you just keep moaning and trying to subvert the will of Parliament and the People......this is democracy.......you may disagree but this is how it works.....
 
See one of my earlier posts. That figure was an equivalent figure of the cost of a new hospital.

Yawn, yawn, yawn...
Quote your post please mate, because all I remember is a big red bus.

Also when you do that please tell me how much the new Royal is costing, thanks.
 
Quote your post please mate, because all I remember is a big red bus.

Also when you do that please tell me how much the new Royal is costing, thanks.


1. I don't know why I should be a crutch for your laziness, but here goes anyway. Post #17569, previous page to this one!

2. "...Also when you do that please tell me how much the new Royal is costing, thanks..." Don't quite understand this. Figures are EQUIVALENTS, as I posted.
 
I find it both hilarious and worrying that people are fighting like buggery to cover up the obvious lies and deception of many prominent Brexiteers.

A smarter man would call into question the mental health of some of the people here.
 
I find it both hilarious and worrying that people are fighting like buggery to cover up the obvious lies and deception of many prominent Brexiteers.

A smarter man would call into question the mental health of some of the people here.
Language Timothy - also calling posters mental is not in the rules laid out for this new thread merged with the old EU thread current affairs it was a trail to see if insults could be left out between posters e.g. post one by the moderator.

Its not just about cost though is it regarding the EU it covers a wide range of subjects on why the OUT vote won - if you are looking at high cost our Foreign Aid budget is far more extravagant for example, and expected to rise even higher than our net contribution to be a member of the EU!
 
I find it both hilarious and worrying that people are fighting like buggery to cover up the obvious lies and deception of many prominent Brexiteers.

A smarter man would call into question the mental health of some of the people here.

I can't understand why anyone wants to fight yesterday's battles. The bill is going to the Lords. Our issues now are how to achieve the best possible outcome for the UK both within the EU and the rest of the World.......
 
Language Timothy - also calling posters mental is not in the rules laid out for this new thread merged with the old EU thread current affairs it was a trail to see if insults could be left out between posters e.g. post one by the moderator.

Its not just about cost though is it regarding the EU it covers a wide range of subjects on why the OUT vote won - if you are looking at high cost our Foreign Aid budget is far more extravagant for example, and expected to rise even higher than our net contribution to be a member of the EU!

If you see a duck, call it a duck.

If people were as enraged about tax avoidance as they are about money being spent on educating girls in the middle east, then things would probably look a little rosier.
 
Dominic Cummings - the Leave campaign Director, has admitted the £350m / NHS claim was untrue and that without it Leave wouldn't have won.

So no shooting the messenger, blaming the source etc etc ad infinitum, it's straight from the horses mouth -verbatim.

There is no single definitive figure because there are different sets of official figures but the Treasury gross figure is slightly more than £350m of which we get back roughly half

So it was never going to be £350 then as the net cost of EU membership was circa half of that total, thanks for clearing that up Dominic

Would we have won without £350m/NHS? All our research and the close result strongly suggests No.

So you admit that without the £350m NHS lie, then you'd have not won then Dominic, thanks for clearing that up.

http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2017/01/dominic-cummings-brexit-referendum-won/

As he says in the piece, the swing was only circa 650,000, and they clinched that crucial majority with a lie.
 
So one man says that on a single point Leave wouldn't have won, and you set complete 100% store by what a single individual says, FLHD?

I have to say that your reasoning in the above is totally flawed.

The crucial majority was clinched with a lie? Rubbish! If Cameron et al (Remainers)had not lied through their teeth all the way, and told the turth instead, one could argue that the Leave margin of victory could have topped the million mark, or would still have had a winning margin if one offsets the one against the other.

I do love to see the urinating in the wind process by so-called experts, and individuals...
 
I find it both hilarious and worrying that people are fighting like buggery to cover up the obvious lies and deception of many prominent Remainers.

A smarter man would call into question the mental health of some of the people here.


1. Fixed.

2. It is disgraceful that you make any kind of suggestion as to the mental health of ANY member on here. Your sentence is quite simply a disgrace to this forum, and you should be totally ashamed of it...
 
So one man says that on a single point Leave wouldn't have won, and you set complete 100% store by what a single individual says, FLHD?

I have to say that your reasoning in the above is totally flawed.

The crucial majority was clinched with a lie? Rubbish! If Cameron et al (Remainers)had not lied through their teeth all the way, and told the turth instead, one could argue that the Leave margin of victory could have topped the million mark, or would still have had a winning margin if one offsets the one against the other.

I do love to see the urinating in the wind process by so-called experts, and individuals...
Not one random man, the Director of the Leave campaign. He's not formed that opinion based on a whim either, as he clearly says that they'd reached that conclusion based on their research.

It's from the orchestrator of the entire campaign. the people who came up with a slogan that they knew was a lie, he's clearly said it was enough to swing the vote by their own research, and yet you claim it's somehow MY reasoning that's flawed, when it's not even my reasoning lol

You're hilarious mate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top