tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
I wonder if the blowhard realises it was a fictional film.
Someone should make him read the full version of Guy Gibson's Enemy Coast Ahead.
I wonder if the blowhard realises it was a fictional film.
Off we go again
Off we go again
Off we go again
He actually put #Alphamale lollollollollollolSomeone should make him read the full version of Guy Gibson's Enemy Coast Ahead.
anybody wanting to be in a war needs there head testingNow that would have been a sight to behold.
![]()
theconversation.com
The collapse of Britain’s empire in the decades after World War II was followed by a huge growth and then persistence of extreme economic inequality. Britain’s relative economic decline occurred in tandem with the loss of almost all of its remaining colonies in the 1970s and the economic benefit they had provided. The British thought that joining the European Economic Community in 1973 could replace this loss. It didn’t, because the European relationship was mutual, rather than exploitative.
![]()
Brexit: how the end of Britain’s empire led to rising inequality that helped Leave to victory
The link between empire, inequality – and Brexit.theconversation.com
Ouch. Zinger

Since you've more than had enough of me already....
This is a very poor article, speculating (and therefore misdiagnosing) about a number of flimsy correlations between the end of empire and the rise of inequality, without properly considering other more relevant causes, and generally premised on dubious logic.
For instance, here: "Many accounts persist in suggesting that what swung the vote was disaffected working-class electors in the north of England, despite the majority of Leave votes coming from the south of England, from the middle classes and from people who normally vote Conservative or UKIP" - the latter clause does not negate the former; 'swung' does not refer to the majority who had opposed joining the EU since the 1970s and were always going to vote Leave given another chance, it means the people described by the former clause, who were previously ill-informed or indifferent about Europe, but won over by a campaign by that better addressed their material and emotional grievances.
The article is also entirely based on common myths and misunderstandings about the role of the empire in British economic history.
This is much better, and actually research-based: https://members.tortoisemedia.com/2...g=uf1AIFQvLmWd86cC3WSIyw4ea24PGozQsEz_3NKIBYU
That website seems to be yet another attempt to reclaim 'hard-hitting fact-driven rational pragmatic centrist non-partisan analysis' or whatever, but the links I've seen so far have consisted of academics spouting off on topics they haven't properly researched, and actually know little about.
(of course, let he who is without sin, obviously.... ; )
Off we go again
Off we go again
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.