Hahaha. Every American has access to healthcare. It's a fact. If you can't pay for it, it's fine, you still have many, many avenues to get treatment for free. If you're given treatment without some sort of coverage and you can't pay for it, you don't get thrown in jail, in most cases nothing even happens to you. This doom and gloom nonsense about American healthcare is laughable.
I've invited everyone I've discussed this with in this thread to tell me why the USG should be believed capable of a socialized care system, and I've gotten exactly zero responses. Why? Because it's a huge albatross of a hole in the argument.
You used the phrase "anti-ethical to a Progressive nation" earlier in this thread to support your moral compass with regards to abortion.
Do you not think it is also anti-ethical to profit from healthcare as a whole? Human life being exploited for the wealth by those bound to protect human life?
There is no albatross BTW. If we as a nation chose to put American health ahead of profits and put out budgetary concerns as a nation in that direction I have no doubt the government could run an efficient system. Sure there would be flaws...just as there are in any government program...like the military for example...or the private sector as well.
The problem with human health being for profit is the consumer's best interest isn't at heart...rather the stockholders are the more important piece.