Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

[Prevenger17]

Great point!

Adversus is such a thought leader. I'm so glad he's out there on the front lines fighting tyranny so that we can sleep at night

 

[Moomin]

I can't wait to see what Trump has planned for the deep state next hehehehe

He is stuffing the nuclear codes deep into his japs eye so his fans can say he is playing 3D chess.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

He is stuffing the nuclear codes deep into his japs eye so his fans can say he is playing 3D chess.

Crikey. Im not sure about this @Toffee_Loaf
Confidential plans hidden in elderly male genitalia?! Hopefully just more fake news.

 

[JimmyJeffers]

The last few pages have been high end discussion. Well done to all involved.

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

The exact same day that the FBI is forced to turn over to Congress absolutely damning and credible allegations regarding Joe Biden’s illegal, egregious, and treasonous corruption, Joe Biden weaponizes his Department of Justice to indict Donald Trump.

Just a coincidence

He’s bent, mate
Stop your pathetic whataboutery

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

The last few pages have been high end discussion. Well done to all involved.

Fanks

 

[JimmyJeffers]

Fanks

Maybe he’s one of those good sex criminals?

 

[Noisy noise annoys]

Maybe he’s one of those good sex criminals?

 

[LinekersLegs]

The self imolation of Graham"s reputation over the past few years has been remarkable.

 

[Amw79]

Huge info coming in from an DOJ whistleblower, spilling the beans on the Trump indictment. This changes everything.

 

[LinekersLegs]

Gee, sure seems like there were a lot of "woke liberals" in Trump's cabinet.



Alternatively, and just spitballing here, Trump criminally endangered national security.

 

[verreauxi]

Technically, you said that yourself ...

I accept your weird non-apology. Thank you.

 

[verreauxi]

That just shows how closed minded you are. That you can't be persuaded from your own intractable beliefs despite having not heard both sides of an argument (and you attempted to accuse us of being uninformed, in denial and unintelligent). You go on criticise the church, but it looks like you that has religious convictions - they're just weirdly towards 'wanting to lockup everyone at Fox News'. Perhaps you need to have a moment of reflection yourself ....

I will strongly attest to @Martin Alvito being one of the more open-minded, across-the-political-spectrum folks here.

 

[verreauxi]

The self imolation of Graham"s reputation over the past few years has been remarkable.

The kompromat Trump has on Graham must be quite substantial.

 

[Martin Alvito]

You have enough information to conclude already? Why even bother with trials. Let's go straight to jail and executions? We're back to burning witches again under your wonderfully enlightened world view.

Go on tell us again how we're uninformed, in denial and unintelligent when you make statements like the one below which is just mindblowing. Ever heard of a free press? The 1st Amendment? Freedom of Speech? Freedom of Thought? Nah you know best ... Do you dream of locking people up because they disagree with you? I am worried that you've been radicalised.

The fact that this particular case has enough in the public domain to draw my conclusions does not support your conclusion that this is what I think generally about all cases. You are attempting to generalize from instances. That is a blatant logical fallacy.

I'm certain I'm on record as both believing that we need a legal system, and that it is desperately in need of deep reforms. It treats some animals more equally than others, with socio-economic status frequently the largest determinant of outcomes. Trump is uniquely positioned to fight his case, using a novel legal strategy, by virtue of past position and finances. Fox has deep enough pockets to fight a case that the folks in the Capitol on January 6th cannot fight.

A good example is O.J. Simpson. Walked when he had the money, ended up in prison when he didn't. This doesn't prove the point alone, as stated above. What proves the point is the academic research on the subject, which is savage and holds up across both time and space. It raises some additional points I think are excellent, like the problems with our jury selection system. It also raises some other ones I think are more questionable.