Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Can you not personally insult people, please? I think it's pathetic that you would treat someone so disrespectfully. People are allowed to have whatever opinion they want. There is nothing stupid in any of the views that have been shared and if you think there is you can question people politely. It isn't difficult.

He’s a grown man who uses the term “sheeple”. He is either a wum or very stupid.
 
Can you not personally insult people, please? I think it's pathetic that you would treat someone so disrespectfully. People are allowed to have whatever opinion they want. There is nothing stupid in any of the views that have been shared and if you think there is you can question people politely. It isn't difficult.

Says the person who called me "gay"
 
Can you not personally insult people, please? I think it's pathetic that you would treat someone so disrespectfully. People are allowed to have whatever opinion they want. There is nothing stupid in any of the views that have been shared and if you think there is you can question people politely. It isn't difficult.
In fairness, if you come on a public forum supporting Donald Trump, you should expect your intelligence to be questioned.
 
I think my child is more mature than you are. He's 9. You're comparing people to Nazi's and calling people racists. Grow up. How can you take this stuff so personally? Egged on by all the other predictable saddos liking your posts too...
Took 8 minutes to go from "pretty please don't insult others" to "I'll call people whatever I please!!"

Silly person.
 
But again, all speculation on your part. You did it above (and also see below). I just would prefer to see some evidence. But in any case, with respect to speech after speech, these were almost invariably rallies of his own choosing. Remember when he'd fly to Tulsa or Phoenix or some such and have a rally while decrying witch hunt. These were on his own volition, and he never said anything of substance here, except to say things like "witch hunt" "Hilary" etc. This was not a drain on his resources as he wasn't compelled to congress--he just chose to do it.

You can do a search of the all of Trump's remarks and exchanges with reporters at the American Presidency Project (I've provided a screen shot to show you what you will find--each "Remarks" can be click on to find its content). You can even do searches of key words for all of Trump's press conferences, exchanges with reporters, interviews, press releases...and when I did this, I couldn't seem to find much mention of Russia, Mueller, etc. So I don't really see how, in speech after speech, he had to address the subject.

Here is the weblink if you want to give it a go: https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/advanced-search

View attachment 213898

More speculation here:


More speculation here:
"'Cause Chevy didn't make a 327 in '55. The 327 didn't come out til '62. And it wasn't offered in the Bellaire with the 4-barrel carburetor til '64. However, in 1964 the correct ignition timing would be 4 degrees before top dead center."
 
I dont get this at all.
Trump is a terrible communicator.
I couldn't make head nor tail of what he was saying.
The Mueller report found that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in a sweeping and systemic fashion.
He refused to bring any charges against Trump as he was a sitting president.
Furthermore, Trump was happy to talk about 'Russiagate' as he knew all he had to say was 'witch hunt' and he'd pile up donations from his base.
Then it was straight back to injecting light in to your veins to kill covid.

Like I said, monetizing stupidity.
tbh I thought Trump a very clear communicator when he was saying ""it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this."

Or when he said "see as president I could have declassified it. Now I can't, you know, but it is still secret"

Or when he asked his attorneys "wouldn't it be better if we just told them there is nothing here" and "well, look isn't it better if there are no documents"

Weirdly these aren't the statements his supporters want to talk about.
 
Can you not personally insult people, please? I think it's pathetic that you would treat someone so disrespectfully. People are allowed to have whatever opinion they want. There is nothing stupid in any of the views that have been shared and if you think there is you can question people politely. It isn't difficult.
This just isn't true. If your opinion runs counter to well-established fact, you're either in denial, unintelligent or uninformed. Most people would call all of the preceding pejorative statements insults.

Where we run into problems is when what people perceive to be well-established fact is, in fact, wrong. History brims with examples of that problem, but relatively few people discriminate well between 'settled' and 'best of our knowledge' results. If you're a flat-earther, well, Kepler and Newton have you covered. Gravity would behave in very interesting ways on a flat earth, which can't form through a natural process anyway largely due to gravity (to the best of our knowledge).

Your problem here is staking out a whole collocation of positions that run counter to 'settled' items, unrepentantly refusing to accept hard facts, and behaving like a provocateur whose entire objective is to radicalize the quiet people whose views sympathize with yours somewhat. I continue to believe that you know exactly what you are doing, and that you are doing this in a relatively sophisticated, unsophisticated way. The best evidence available to me suggests you have enough intellect to either learn, or give it a rest, by this point. I can't prove that, but careful observation suggests you are a 'wum', in forum parlance.
 
tbh I thought Trump a very clear communicator when he was saying ""it is like, highly confidential. Secret. This is secret information. Look, look at this."

Or when he said "see as president I could have declassified it. Now I can't, you know, but it is still secret"

Or when he asked his attorneys "wouldn't it be better if we just told them there is nothing here" and "well, look isn't it better if there are no documents"

Weirdly these aren't the statements his supporters want to talk about.
yea, arguing with trump supporters years ago was kinda baffling and depressing.
Now it's just kinda silly. (and still a bit depressing)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top