Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
LinekersLegs said:
As for the first part, no because there is no evidence of any nefarious dealings by Biden Snr and if his son has done anything wrong that is for regular courts to deal with (as would be for anything Trump’s kids have done).

And whilst I can sometimes see the benefit in letting things go I don’t believe inciting an insurrection that gets people killed is one of those things you cam just wave away.
Click to expand...

It’s no different to Democrat cities allowing no go zones, defunding Police and allowing businesses to be burnt out. It just happens to be the latest example and in a very public place. Either way people are demonstrating, not in a very nice way, and from both ends of the political spectrum. There are no winners here, they are all as bad as one another...
 
Toffeeslam said:
Sorry but sedition and insurrection you can’t just let go.......it’s treasonous and warrants the strongest penalties.

Tge Biden thing what aboutary and you can argue the same thing about most of the trump family.

The riot was a terror attack against the state by a sitting President because he lost an election.
Click to expand...

When does it become sedition and insurrection. King George thought it was back in the 1700’s.....you see it’s only the winners who determine whether it was or wasn’t......
 
peteblue said:
It’s no different to Democrat cities allowing no go zones, defunding Police and allowing businesses to be burnt out. It just happens to be the latest example and in a very public place. Either way people are demonstrating, not in a very nice way, and from both ends of the political spectrum. There are no winners here, they are all as bad as one another...
Click to expand...
Storming a government building is against the law. It's actually in the constitution.

Occupying a park for a few weeks in a public area is not.

Those who broke windows and turned over cars and lashed out were arrested in those cities. For the record

Equating one to the other is shameful.
 
peteblue said:
It’s no different to Democrat cities allowing no go zones, defunding Police and allowing businesses to be burnt out. It just happens to be the latest example and in a very public place. Either way people are demonstrating, not in a very nice way, and from both ends of the political spectrum. There are no winners here, they are all as bad as one another...
Click to expand...
It is entirely different.

Defunding the police is a political stance. It's something done through legal channels. You push an agenda, legally, by getting representatives to agree to changing how police funding works. It's really no different than massively funding the police. Only the opposite.

Burning buildings is criminal action against civilian targets. It's arson. The people involved should be prosecuted for arson. Most people in the marches across the country (and world) through months and months were not involved. But I agree that those that were should be prosecuted through legal channels.

An attack on the capitol while Congress is in session is something called "sedition" which neither of the others were. Sedition should be seen as one of the highest possible crimes, as it is an attack against the public body as a whole.
 
peteblue said:
Did Bidens actions, or that of his son in nefarious business deals not warrant similar retribution. You see this is what I’m on about. Sometimes you have to let it go, for the benefit of the country. But for Pelosi, it seems personal, and she won’t care as long as she gets what she wants.......
Click to expand...


Pete, honest question. If a few years ago Jeremy Corbyn refused to recognise the results of the election, and incited a mob of thousands of people to storm Westminster to overturn the result, and a policeman and a few other people were killed in the process, would you:

A. Want him to be arrested and removed as the leader of the Labour party

or

B. Let him go about his daily business as if nothing happened to help the healing begin

A yes or no answer pls, refrain from crap quips followed by an ellipsis
 
SteveSC said:
Storming a government building is against the law. It's actually in the constitution.

Occupying a park for a few weeks in a public area is not.

Those who broke windows and turned over cars and lashed out were arrested in those cities. For the record

Equating one to the other is shameful.
Click to expand...

Ah, so it’s degrees of lawbreaking. Come on, be honest, both sides should be ashamed....
 
RaleighBlue said:
It is entirely different.

Defunding the police is a political stance. It's something done through legal channels. You push an agenda, legally, by getting representatives to agree to changing how police funding works. It's really no different than massively funding the police. Only the opposite.

Burning buildings is criminal action against civilian targets. It's arson. The people involved should be prosecuted for arson. Most people in the marches across the country (and world) through months and months were not involved. But I agree that those that were should be prosecuted through legal channels.

An attack on the capitol while Congress is in session is something called "sedition" which neither of the others were. Sedition should be seen as one of the highest possible crimes, as it is an attack against the public body as a whole.
Click to expand...

Your ‘attack’ is someone else’s ‘demonstration’.....
 
peteblue said:
When does it become sedition and insurrection. King George thought it was back in the 1700’s.....you see it’s only the winners who determine whether it was or wasn’t......
Click to expand...

This isn’t the 1700’s and this has nothing to do with King George....your deflecting again so address the point.

He tried to stop the certification of the next president and results of a free and fair election to keep his grip on power...this is something you would expect from the late Mugabe.

it’s the very definition of sedition to incite insurrection to affect a coup.

you can’t just let that go because if you do you set a precedent which is dangerous for any democracy
 
Prevenger17 said:
Pete, honest question. If a few years ago Jeremy Corbyn refused to recognise the results of the election, and incited a mob of thousands of people to storm Westminster to overturn the result, and a policeman and a few other people were killed in the process, would you:

A. Want him to be arrested and removed as the leader of the Labour party

or

B. Let him go about his daily business as if nothing happened to help the healing begin

A yes or no answer pls, refrain from crap quips followed by an ellipsis
Click to expand...

The answer would be A, without a second thought. However, if Theresa May had allowed certain towns or cities to set up no go zones or allow burning of buildings or defunding of Police, I would have put her in the same cell......
 
peteblue said:
When does it become sedition and insurrection. King George thought it was back in the 1700’s.....you see it’s only the winners who determine whether it was or wasn’t......
Click to expand...
In your opinion, did the Trump mob carry the field last Wednesday? As best I can tell, they didn’t. As such...sedition and insurrection.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

→ Log in 🔑 Register
🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top