Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
Republican or republican leaning voters are about 40% of the US electorate, give or take, he still polls well with them, around mid 80% I think so he will be guaranteed about 35% of votes in the next election. Electoral collage or not that's not enough and it's hard to see where he picks up enough swing voters unless the Dems completely screw up the next two years.
Not out of the question
 
He’s genuinely going to get someone in the media killed at some point. Fairly amazed it hasn’t happened already.
Well if it was going to happen it would have likely been at the peak of his 'war' against the media when he was accusing them of favouritism in the election race. Seeing as it hasn't happened, I doubt it will. But I don't suppose that'll stop such accusations from flying around the newspapers as if it were only a matter of time. Sure it wasn't good to see that happen and I am sure the President regrets that one of his supporters did that. Nobody wants to see somebody just doing their job attacked in that way. If he's directly asked about it I am sure he'd say the same thing.
 
Well if it was going to happen it would have likely been at the peak of his 'war' against the media when he was accusing them of favouritism in the election race. Seeing as it hasn't happened, I doubt it will. But I don't suppose that'll stop such accusations from flying around the newspapers as if it were only a matter of time. Sure it wasn't good to see that happen and I am sure the President regrets that one of his supporters did that. Nobody wants to see somebody just doing their job attacked in that way. If he's directly asked about it I am sure he'd say the same thing.
To troll effectively people on some small level have to take you seriously, this is a very poor effort
 
Well if it was going to happen it would have likely been at the peak of his 'war' against the media when he was accusing them of favouritism in the election race. Seeing as it hasn't happened, I doubt it will. But I don't suppose that'll stop such accusations from flying around the newspapers as if it were only a matter of time. Sure it wasn't good to see that happen and I am sure the President regrets that one of his supporters did that. Nobody wants to see somebody just doing their job attacked in that way. If he's directly asked about it I am sure he'd say the same thing.

I suppose we’re fortunate that the pipe bombs sent by a trump supporter to a number of media outlets were either inert of failed to function otherwise we’d be having a very different conversation .
 
On Facebook today:

Someone on Quora asked "Why do some British people not like Donald Trump?" Nate White, an articulate and witty writer from England wrote this magnificent response.
A few things spring to mind.
Trump lacks certain qualities which the British traditionally esteem.
For instance, he has no class, no charm, no coolness, no credibility, no compassion, no wit, no warmth, no wisdom, no subtlety, no sensitivity, no self-awareness, no humility, no honour and no grace - all qualities, funnily enough, with which his predecessor Mr. Obama was generously blessed.
So for us, the stark contrast does rather throw Trump’s limitations into embarrassingly sharp relief.
Plus, we like a laugh. And while Trump may be laughable, he has never once said anything wry, witty or even faintly amusing - not once, ever.
I don’t say that rhetorically, I mean it quite literally: not once, not ever. And that fact is particularly disturbing to the British sensibility - for us, to lack humour is almost inhuman.
But with Trump, it’s a fact. He doesn’t even seem to understand what a joke is - his idea of a joke is a crass comment, an illiterate insult, a casual act of cruelty.
Trump is a troll. And like all trolls, he is never funny and he never laughs; he only crows or jeers.
And scarily, he doesn’t just talk in crude, witless insults - he actually thinks in them. His mind is a simple bot-like algorithm of petty prejudices and knee-jerk nastiness.
There is never any under-layer of irony, complexity, nuance or depth. It’s all surface.
Some Americans might see this as refreshingly upfront.
Well, we don’t. We see it as having no inner world, no soul.
And in Britain we traditionally side with David, not Goliath. All our heroes are plucky underdogs: Robin Hood, Dick Whittington, Oliver Twist.
Trump is neither plucky, nor an underdog. He is the exact opposite of that.
He’s not even a spoiled rich-boy, or a greedy fat-cat.
He’s more a fat white slug. A Jabba the Hutt of privilege.
And worse, he is that most unforgivable of all things to the British: a bully.
That is, except when he is among bullies; then he suddenly transforms into a snivelling sidekick instead.
There are unspoken rules to this stuff - the Queensberry rules of basic decency - and he breaks them all. He punches downwards - which a gentleman should, would, could never do - and every blow he aims is below the belt. He particularly likes to kick the vulnerable or voiceless - and he kicks them when they are down.
So the fact that a significant minority - perhaps a third - of Americans look at what he does, listen to what he says, and then think 'Yeah, he seems like my kind of guy’ is a matter of some confusion and no little distress to British people, given that:
  • Americans are supposed to be nicer than us, and mostly are.
  • You don't need a particularly keen eye for detail to spot a few flaws in the man.
This last point is what especially confuses and dismays British people, and many other people too; his faults seem pretty bloody hard to miss.
After all, it’s impossible to read a single tweet, or hear him speak a sentence or two, without staring deep into the abyss. He turns being artless into an art form; he is a Picasso of pettiness; a Shakespeare of [Poor language removed]. His faults are fractal: even his flaws have flaws, and so on ad infinitum.
God knows there have always been stupid people in the world, and plenty of nasty people too. But rarely has stupidity been so nasty, or nastiness so stupid.
He makes Nixon look trustworthy and George W look smart.
In fact, if Frankenstein decided to make a monster assembled entirely from human flaws - he would make a Trump.
And a remorseful Doctor Frankenstein would clutch out big clumpfuls of hair and scream in anguish:
'My God… what… have… I… created?
If being a [Poor language removed] was a TV show, Trump would be the boxed set.
 
I suppose we’re fortunate that the pipe bombs sent by a trump supporter to a number of media outlets were either inert of failed to function otherwise we’d be having a very different conversation .
Yeah, I am also sure that Donald Trump publicaly told his supporters not to engage in any acts of that kind. I really question those who genuinely think that the US President would encourage murder.
 
Yeah, I am also sure that Donald Trump publicaly told his supporters not to engage in any acts of that kind. I really question those who genuinely think that the US President would encourage murder.

I think there is a difference between openly encouraging murder and being oblivious or simply not caring about the consequences of demonising a group of people .
 
Yeah, I am also sure that Donald Trump publicaly told his supporters not to engage in any acts of that kind. I really question those who genuinely think that the US President would encourage murder.
Yeah, that oh-so-sincere instruction would probably have a little more weight to it if he didn’t call the free press the “Enemy of the People” on a near daily basis.
 
Yeah, I am also sure that Donald Trump publicaly told his supporters not to engage in any acts of that kind. I really question those who genuinely think that the US President would encourage murder.
He literally told his supporters to knock the crap out of protesters and said he'd pay their legal fees if they got charged for the violence. He groups the media with protesters at his rallies all the time insisting that they are the enemy of the people.
He continually encourages violence against people he doesn't like.
 
He literally told his supporters to knock the crap out of protesters and said he'd pay their legal fees if they got charged for the violence. He groups the media with protesters at his rallies all the time insisting that they are the enemy of the people.
He continually encourages violence against people he doesn't like.
Jeez. Source? I'd be surprised if that was true. More than prepared to retract my previous statements if he indeed did encourage that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top