Current Affairs Donald Trump POS: Judgement cometh and that right soon

Status
Not open for further replies.
As for Cohen, I don't really care that criminality is being identified as a byproduct. I do think it's ideal if that remains compartmentalized from the Trump investigation to the extent possible. Particularly when it comes to things like intercepting calls with the WH. I'm not concluding that they're not appropriate or never appropriate, but it's a dangerous precedent and we probably want to maintain a high threshold for FBI wiretaps on conversations between POTUS and his lawyers. I'm increasingly concerned that threshold isn't being maintained.
Why is it ideal if it remains compartmentalized from the Trump investigation? Bill Clinton was originally investigated for Whitewater and Ken Starr eventually ended up talking about a blue dress and a cigar, people found it easy enough to differentiate between the two issues and not sure why this would be much different.

What info that we currently know gives you concern that the threshold isn’t being maintained?

Whilst I aren’t as worried given the particular target of the FBI wiretaps I share the concern as a general issue - I just think if FBI wiretaps are being abused they are far more likely to be between an average citizen/immigrant and their lawyer rather than the sitting US president. I think there are a lot of improvements that could be made to the criminal justice system in this country but doubt that the politicians and their associates of either party are the most at risk from any current errors and excesses - Joe Arpaio being a prime example.
 
Truly amazing if not even Don McGahn or Kelly knew in advance.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/poli...37ac52-4ee6-11e8-84a0-458a1aa9ac0a_story.html
He may have had a strategy, but Rudolph W. Giuliani hatched it almost entirely in secret.

The White House counsel had no idea. Neither did the White House chief of staff, nor the White House press secretary, nor the new White House lawyer overseeing its handling of the Russia investigation.

They watched, agog, as Giuliani, the president’s recently-installed personal attorney, freestyled on live television Wednesday night about the president’s legal troubles and unveiled an explosive new fact: that Trump reimbursed his longtime personal attorney, Michael Cohen, the $130,000 paid to adult-films actress Stormy Daniels to ensure her silence about an alleged sexual encounter with Trump.

Giuliani’s attempt to defuse a ticking time bomb exposed Trump’s failure to divulge the full story about the Daniels hush money by contradictory public statements from him and White House spokespeople. One month ago, Trump told reporters he did not know about the $130,000 payment to Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, and did not know where Cohen got the money to make it.

Aides and advisers to the president — who were scrambling Thursday morning to manage the fallout of Giuliani’s interview with Sean Hannity, a Trump-friendly Fox News Channel host — expressed a mixture of exasperation and horror. One White House official texted a reporter a string of emoji characters in response, including a tiny container of popcorn
 
Why is it ideal if it remains compartmentalized from the Trump investigation? Bill Clinton was originally investigated for Whitewater and Ken Starr eventually ended up talking about a blue dress and a cigar, people found it easy enough to differentiate between the two issues and not sure why this would be much different.

What info that we currently know gives you concern that the threshold isn’t being maintained?

Whilst I aren’t as worried given the particular target of the FBI wiretaps I share the concern as a general issue - I just think if FBI wiretaps are being abused they are far more likely to be between an average citizen/immigrant and their lawyer rather than the sitting US president. I think there are a lot of improvements that could be made to the criminal justice system in this country but doubt that the politicians and their associates of either party are the most at risk from any current errors and excesses - Joe Arpaio being a prime example.

Because Bill was targeted as a player in both? Like I said, the Cohen thing is done already, I would hope they didn't wiretap him, personal attorney for the President, solely for the Stormy Daniels fiasco. But so far that's all I know of, and it seems like if there is more on Cohen, it would likely be unrelated to POTUS.
 
Because Bill was targeted as a player in both? Like I said, the Cohen thing is done already, I would hope they didn't wiretap him, personal attorney for the President, solely for the Stormy Daniels fiasco. But so far that's all I know of, and it seems like if there is more on Cohen, it would likely be unrelated to POTUS.
Yeahhh, 20ish years as Trump's self proclaimed "fixer"... can't imagine any of his wrongdoings will be anything to do with Trump.
 
Because Bill was targeted as a player in both? Like I said, the Cohen thing is done already, I would hope they didn't wiretap him, personal attorney for the President, solely for the Stormy Daniels fiasco. But so far that's all I know of, and it seems like if there is more on Cohen, it would likely be unrelated to POTUS.
But Trump could be targeted as a player in both of these, we won’t know his full involvement until the investigation is complete so why not just wait and see what happens?

Similarly with the wiretap, this is just one report and it would not be the first time there were claims of tapping Trump phones that came to nothing.

However if there was a wire tap the lawyers I follow on both sides of the political aisle seem to believe that a past transgression wouldn’t be enough, it would have to be something current and to target the presidents lawyer you’d guess there would be something serious as there are several safety mechanisms to prevent abuse


Could it be improper, sure, but unless you believe that there should never be any investigation into anyone surrounding a president I think we need more information to even consider that conclusion.

I find your statement “it would likely be unrelated to POTUS” a pretty big leap of faith in any politician let alone Trump.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top