Donald Trump for President Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's destroyed her in that debate....

"You'd be in jail".

Sadly because shes so corrupt shes probably going to win...welcome to world war 3.
 
He's destroyed her in that debate....

"You'd be in jail".

Sadly because shes so corrupt shes probably going to win...welcome to world war 3.

Until you actually fact check it Zat.

Like so many others you are regurgitating the factually incorrect statement that she is corrupt just because Trump and his right wing nut jobs say it.

Trump is far more corrupt both legally and morally.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_Donald_Trump

I will say he's boss at settling out of court. He's repugnant in every other way.

I still think the funniest one was when his dad bought $3.5 mil worth of poker chips at one of his casinos with no intention of gambling. Convicted of illegally financing a casino.
 
Also, the wikileaks stuff is massively overblown.

If my work emails were hacked, it would read so similar. We make a ton of decisions and bounce the positives and negatives off each other before actually publishing what we agree upon as the right plan of action.

Isn't that why we love email at work? A place to share ideas, dispute them, decide on what the right message is, and then publicly share the direction our organizations are working towards...the leaked ones are just so mundane to me.

If I were running for POTUS, I'd definitely want to discuss anything I was going to publish on Twitter with the folks I trust in my inner circle.
 
Forgive my ignorance of American politics, but why are the Republics not the force they once were? Weren't they the natural party of government until recently?

Since the end of the 1960s, you've had 8 presidents, 5 of which have been Republican.

they still run a heck of a lot states, and have equal representation in the supreme court at the moment (Scalia is probably going to be replaced by a middle of road centrist who leans left - the repubs are going to plead with Obama to send Garland back up after Trump loses, they might be successful). They are currently dead for the presidency but hold plenty of power and things change quickly when it comes to the presidency here.

The republicians were almost already in full revolt, you saw glimpses of it with Palin. Then Obama got elected.

The wall st. repubs who run the party then funded a bunch of groups to whip the Palin crazies to win midterms in 2010 and it did work. However when you are appealing to wack jobs by telling them that every single of Obama's policies is just a socialist plot to take away your guns, sell them to Muslims who will kill you, and then use the profits to send your public school kids on a Mexican gay wedding field trip those crazies actually believe its true. And if they'll believe that's true well then any cockamanie story that someone posts on the internets is also true and they lost control of them.

However, Obama supports plenty of policies that the wall street repubs do because he's just a milk toast middle of the road blue dog democrat. Only now Obama is bad=anyone who votes or even just compromises with him on just one issue is bad=the republician leadership must be stopped.

There is also this notion that poor mostly white males who vote for people like Trump and usually against their interests because someday they will be rich or that someday they'll be Donald Trump. I don't really believe that. The truth is they don't really care about taxes/spending (trump never campaigned in the primaries on a lower taxes platform), they don't really care about GOOD CHRISTIAN VALUES (Trump), they don't care about freedom (Trump wholly supports Guliani's police state and loves Putin), and they are OK with their own pitiful economic and social status. As long there is still a group of people still around that they can drag down beneath them and feel superior too, its OK. It doesn't have to be just blacks, it could be Mexicans, Muslims, the Chinese or better yet all of them.
 
Last edited:
Forgive my ignorance of American politics, but why are the Republics not the force they once were? Weren't they the natural party of government until recently?

Since the end of the 1960s, you've had 8 presidents, 5 of which have been Republican.


.....I read both Hillary and Bill Clinton's books and both made it clear that the Replublican Party were masters of 'dirty campaign' tactics. The Clinton's were paranoid about countering those tactics, making the Democrats a slick political movement. It might now explain Hillary Clinton's persona with the US electorate, perhaps the Democrats have become too focused on image and slickness.
 
Also, the wikileaks stuff is massively overblown.

If my work emails were hacked, it would read so similar. We make a ton of decisions and bounce the positives and negatives off each other before actually publishing what we agree upon as the right plan of action.

Isn't that why we love email at work? A place to share ideas, dispute them, decide on what the right message is, and then publicly share the direction our organizations are working towards...the leaked ones are just so mundane to me.

If I were running for POTUS, I'd definitely want to discuss anything I was going to publish on Twitter with the folks I trust in my inner circle.
The emails should concern you given the Clinton campaigns thoughts about their voters. The last section of the first paragraph tells it all.
image.webp
 
"Every poll says I beat her in the debate" = "We won the passing"
"Doncha just love that hateful conspiracy between the liberal media and the criminal Clinton cartel" = "If the ref hadn't ignored two stonewall penalties for us and given offside for three of their goals, we would only have lost 5-3..."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top