I sometimes get confused by your points mate, im not sure what they are. Could we have signed Sandro for 25 mill, of course we could, should we have personally i would have no problem with it.
Why cant we compare it, one deal was better value fiscally then the other. I fail to see a problem with that.
In my head, you're basically saying: "Woah he cost £25m surely he should look better than that?"
Whilst also saying "Yeh, look how much better Sandro is than Klaassen and he only cost £5m!"
When in reality Sandro would be £30m+ in my opinion in this market without the release clause.
I see what you mean about how you expect a £25m player to light it up but my point earlier was this window is nuts and '£25m players' really aren't what they used to be.








