Chris O'Connor
Player Valuation: £35m
There's been some revisionist thinking on the merits of this South African team. All of a sudden now that we've won easily, South Africa from being a side under some enforced and necessary transition following more than a couple of big name retirements but strong in some areas, having beaten England at Centurion when the visitors were badly decimated by illness, are now being painted as just the latest version of a can't bat, can't bowl, cant field outfit.
This is just so completely wide off the mark. Yes they've been decimated by retirements and in addition having to rebuild a new team without a sizeable number of kolpak players - their numbers swelled by the ever strengthening exchange rate of sterling against the rand - but they're far weaker at batting than bowling.
For three tests Nortjke, Rabada, Maharaj, Philander was a formidable attack so the sudden urge to pretend it isn't is just ridiculous, even if Philander is now no more than a bit part player. In Beauden Hendricks they have a very decent seamer of some promise. Their batting wasn't up to strength but making runs against that attack wasn't a cakewalk.
This is just so completely wide off the mark. Yes they've been decimated by retirements and in addition having to rebuild a new team without a sizeable number of kolpak players - their numbers swelled by the ever strengthening exchange rate of sterling against the rand - but they're far weaker at batting than bowling.
For three tests Nortjke, Rabada, Maharaj, Philander was a formidable attack so the sudden urge to pretend it isn't is just ridiculous, even if Philander is now no more than a bit part player. In Beauden Hendricks they have a very decent seamer of some promise. Their batting wasn't up to strength but making runs against that attack wasn't a cakewalk.
Last edited: