Chris O'Connor
Player Valuation: £35m
Who do you think is more deserving of the opening birth?
His technique just isn't there yet, needs to learn where his off stump is and not play unnecessary defensive shots when there's no need.
If you're not lining the ball up correctly then you'll get found out very quickly against bowlers with far more guile and accuracy than the county trundlers.
His county record isn't even very exceptional, in fact not at all exceptional. I suspect he was taken along to give experience of touring and what's involved in the hope he'll develop his game domestically and be a contender in a few years. It would give him valuable experience. I'm sure they never thought they'd be forced to have to play him.
It's been an occasional policy in the past to take the odd youngster who isn't likely to feature with the hope of dividends in the future. Perhaps playing Bess in front of Parkinson may mean Parkinson was thought to be in the same category. A young leggy being riskier as opposed to an off spinner. Unless you're Warne, young leggys in test cricket are rare indeed.
If they were picking on merit there are people around with far more experience and a better first class average but merit isn't the only consideration, they have unexpectedly had to play him and had no choice in the matter.