Good news for people feeling guilty about potentially harming their parents thoughI’ve jibbed the App off long ago.
I just assume that no one is arsed about isolation anymore.
Not when earning a living is involved.
Good news for people feeling guilty about potentially harming their parents thoughI’ve jibbed the App off long ago.
I just assume that no one is arsed about isolation anymore.
Not when earning a living is involved.
Mate, I’m only talking about my current personal circumstances.Good news for people feeling guilty about potentially harming their parents though
The unvaccinated have never totalled using above 3% of the total NHS beds available. That's hardly 'taxing' in the middle of peak-waves during a pandemic.the unvaccinated are taxing the health service and increasing the likelihood that health care workers contract the virus, which also taxes the health care system.
They're not as effective as they initially promoted them. They're effective for about 2-3 months, thereafter their effectiveness drops off steeply. Even more so for Omicron, where the double-jabbed are not much more effective than the natural immune system of the unvaccinated.If vaccines were as effective as they say they are we wouldn't be in this position today?
Yes. The EU have declared the double-jabbed are effectively joining the ranks of the unvaccinated (timeframe is 9 months after their last jab).If the vaccines work but not against the new variant then we have double jabbed people essentially not vaccinated?
It doesn't specifically combat the new variant as it was designed for the Wuhan variant, which was 3 generations ago. It may give a short-term (4-6 weeks) immune-system boost. But the heads of the vaccine firms are telling us everyone needs new vaccines designed for Omicron. These vaccines will be 3-doses, and will be ready by Spring.If the booster combats the new variant then how does it when the booster was available before the new variant came about?
It does appear that they are trying to sell us the idea that everyone needs regular vaccinations.If there will always be new variants of this then we will never achieve fully vaccinated status?
Yes. This further spreads the virus. The idea appears to be to persuade people to get the vaccine (get vaccinated, no need to test!) rather than actually contain the virus. The data shows the vaccinated spread the virus in the same way, in the same amount and for the same length of time as the unvaccinated. More so, when factoring in that the vaxxed have more freedoms.If you need a Covid passport to go to events/pubs/restaurants without proving you're negative then you're allowing the spread of the virus
If you think that achieving 100% vaccinated status will get us out of this mess then you are deluded
let us know how you get on...and maybe change your user name xI tested positive for the super dooper gina virus.
Never being above 3% of total NHS beds, during peak-waves of a pandemic, isn't that significant. Flu seasons were much worse (in terms of %-beds used up by flu patients who didn't have the flu jab).Serious illness even more damning, with these people causing 3532 emergency admissions vs 4256 for two doses.
How is that not “significant”
If hundreds of 18-70 year old vaccinated are dying per month then no, the vaccine is not really working very well.Just to pick one thing there in your post, you can't use those vaccinated deaths as some way to prove a point of the vaccine not working. 100,000s - millions - more people are vaccinated than unvaccinated, so of course there will still probably be more deaths in vaccinated than unvaccinated (as there are simply more people in that category).
There's dozens of valid (non-medically exempted) reasons why folk are wary of taking the vaccines. If you genuinely aren't aware of them, I can list some.I think everyone should get the vaccine that is eligible and I have no idea why it is such a big issue for people.
Thank you! This seriously means a lot. Here in Germany the conversation is even worse, people openly promoting the idea of shutting out the unvaxxed from hospitals, supermarkets, even sending them to camps. Wishing death to them is becoming common. The politicians aren't much better.But I am of the opinion that unvaccinated people shouldn't be dehumanised or blamed fully for the latest restrictions
The unvaccinated have never totalled using above 3% of the total NHS beds available. It's their choice to not take the jab and they accept increased risks of hospitalisation. But they pay their taxes and NI just like anyone else. That's what the Health Service is there for.Would be classed as scientifically significant if there was a ~3% gap with those sample sizes. Instead the gaps are more like 300-500%. He’s used figures that oppose his point to make his point…
There's dozens of valid (non-medically exempted) reasons why folk are wary of taking the vaccines. If you genuinely aren't aware of them, I can list some.There isn't really a legitimate reason for not getting vaccinated
No, this is misinformation. Any serious site will tell you the development of a vaccine takes around 10 years.Your first paragraph there. The development wasn't rushed - the beaurocracy behind it was rushed. The actual science of developing it was the same as it ever was.

I didn't say that. I said it was developed for the Wuhan variant, a generation before Alpha.You are correct that the original vaccine was developed for the alpha variant.
Quite...which is why the current vaccines are not much snuff for Omicron, and why they are developing new ones.Probably because that was the only variant present at the time. You can't develop a vaccine for something that doesn't exist yet.
Yes. Would you agree that staying below 3% of total NHS beds during peak-waves of an active pandemic is actually reasonable?Hospitalisations should be all that matter
theconversation.com

self-correction/clarification: This applies to the age group of 18+ where vaccinations are common, and is applicable to the current wave (where most are now vaccinated).never going above 3% of total beds
I assume you haven't actually clicked on those links? They actually explain why the covid vaccine was able to be developed quicker than the standard 10 years. And surprise surprise, its actually the beaurocracy around it that was fast tracked, not the development of the actual vaccine.No, this is misinformation. Any serious site will tell you the development of a vaccine takes around 10 years.
View attachment 149161
I mean you "could" listen to the people who actually developed it, or you could just Google and read the few sentences underneath each listingNo, this is misinformation. Any serious site will tell you the development of a vaccine takes around 10 years.
View attachment 149161
theconversation.com
What a silly thing to say. There are 123,000 or so beds in the NHS. Are you expecting every single one to be occupied by a Covid patient for it to be a problem? What about government spending? That's risen by about 15% due to Covid, which has resulted in the biggest debt intake in two generations. It doesn't take huge numbers to break something when margins are already wafer thin. It's sad that you've gone to "so" much effort to justify the unjustifiable. Just get the vaccine you meff.1) the UK's voluntarily-unvaccinated have not used up more than 3% of total NHS beds at any one time during this current peak wave. If 3% is a regular thing, then maybe it's a problem. But as it occurs during a peak-wave of an active global pandemic, it appears a reasonable percentage.
The bolded bit is important...the blame game can be quite revealing.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.