tsubaki
Player Valuation: £90m
Is testing for other viruses really necessary? Either you test for the known (which has never been needed) or you can't test for the unknown as it doesn't exist yet.
Making tests for a virus that is vaccinated for is just a waste of resources and more importantly money long term. Elements need to be in place for a future pandemic , preparation etc. But for the here and now you have to wind them down because it's just not needed.
Theoretically speaking , Less tests means less focus on a number that is here nor there. You can then measure hospital cases rather than daily tests as a go to with the vaccine in full flow.
Yes, it is. To have a hope of containing an outbreak of something dangerous you've got to detect it quickly and then be able to quickly identify how far it has gone in the community - that means having testing facilities, testers and tracers available and ready to go (not on the scale we have now, but able to be ramped up if needed). When people talk about having defences in place for a future pandemic, that is what they mean - its what many Asian countries did after SARS and it unquestionably resulted in an initial response that was vastly superior to ours.
I mean, if something is out there that is "unknown" we need to know about it PDQ, not wait until people start presenting at A&E with some mysterious respiratory illness. Doing that just results in what we saw in March and April 2020; tens of thousands of dead and society shut down because its spread way past the point of containment.