Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

[roydo]

Why on Earth would people want the for-profit vaccine to be considered bad when they have a Vaccine with a 800000% profit margin to take over?

lol lol

Search me mate.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Imagine believing anything out of the gob of Trump.

So what you're saying is we should all have the Pfizer vaccine or we risk bleeding from the eyes?

 

[peteblue]

Why on Earth would people want the for-profit vaccine to be considered bad when they have a Vaccine with a 800000% profit margin to take over?

lol lol

It’s almost like there was some kind of motive or even an incentive....but surely not....

 

[roydo]

I cant help but get it. Statistical;ly it makes more sense. However, IF their were a choice that vaccine would be in the bin. Tell me I'm wrong...

You dont have to have it.

And yeah, you are wrong. Dangerously so.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Its not just ONE vax that has this though is it? Its a stat that is so low it didnt even get picked up in the trials. A few days ago I posted you the potential side effects of a small pill Mrs R takes every day.

If they were possible under any Covid jab, (one is, clotting), they wouldnt get past the Daily Mail.

I think Pfizer helps with contraception and erectile dysfunction as well as protecting us from Covid. It's really quite remarkable.

 

[Seathestars]

It didn't.
Started to think it might be me. Can't smell the cigarettes that the random squeezed either side of me are smoking.
I'm putting it down to being out of practice. No other explanation.

You might want to think about a PCR mate, being serious too

 

[davek]

So what you're saying is we should all have the Pfizer vaccine or we risk bleeding from the eyes?

*sigh*

 

[LinekersLegs]

It'd kill it stone dead is the more likely scenario. Because in this example (but not the vaccines) people get to choose what product they prefer. Can you see ANYONE choosing to purchase AZ over any other 'brand' if it were market dictated?

Yes, because the mRNA vaccines are substantially more expensive, harder to store and distribute so won't even be available in some places and (at least in JNJ case) you only need one injection rather than two. The current documented risk (whilst greater) is still very marginal.

 

[peteblue]

So what you're saying is we should all have the Pfizer vaccine or we risk bleeding from the eyes?

I see that Pfizer have raised the prices to the EU for future deliveries.....

 

[davek]

You dont have to have it.

And yeah, you are wrong. Dangerously so.

Its not dangerusly so. Ilm getting it, and I advocate other get it too.

But that is another question entirely about it's place in the vaccine pecking order.

 

[Bruce Wayne]

Why on Earth would people want the for-profit vaccine to be considered bad when they have a Vaccine with a 800000% profit margin to take over?

lol lol

 

[Bruce Wayne]

I see that Pfizer have raised the prices to the EU for future deliveries.....

The cognitive....dissonance....is.....too.....much

 

[Goat]

Volume.

NOT ANYMORE

SEEMS LIKE CLOTTING ISSUES WITH THEM ALL.




Is that louder?

 

[davek]

Yes, because the mRNA vaccines are substantially more expensive, harder to store and distribute so won't even be available in some places and (at least in JNJ case) you only need one injection rather than two. The current documented risk (whilst greater) is still very marginal.

That's merely an argument about price and logistics, not quality. And if the choice was down to price it would not obviate the substantive point being made here: ergo all things being equal people would choose an alternative.

 

[davek]

NOT ANYMORE

SEEMS LIKE CLOTTING ISSUES WITH THEM ALL.




Is that louder?

SHUT IT YOU