Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
If ONE contraceptive maker was beyond doubt the leading brand causing clotting would they be in buisness much longer? That's the comparison.
If that one contraceptive maker were causing clotting at the rate currently reported, even if higher than their competitors? Imo yes they would still be authorized but with a warning label "in rare incidences this product may cause blood clots". How it impacted consumer take up would be another matter entirely - reputational risk is very real for both AZ and JNJ now.
 
U.K. vaccines....261K yesterday (including 201K second jabs)....total first jabs 32,250,481....total second jabs 7,857,396....giving an overall total of 40,107,877.... the daily total, seems way down tbh, I hope it’s not due to our friends in Europe.....

Crikey if figures stay that low for 1st jabs it'll be Xmas before I get me first jab
 
Its not just ONE vax that has this though is it? Its a stat that is so low it didnt even get picked up in the trials. A few days ago I posted you the potential side effects of a small pill Mrs R takes every day.

If they were possible under any Covid jab, (one is, clotting), they wouldnt get past the Daily Mail.
Overwhelmingly the volume of these cases are AZ cases.
 
Its not just ONE vax that has this though is it? Its a stat that is so low it didnt even get picked up in the trials. A few days ago I posted you the potential side effects of a small pill Mrs R takes every day.

If they were possible under any Covid jab, (one is, clotting), they wouldnt get past the Daily Mail.

People has lost the ability to judge risk. You will die if you don’t take this pill, you have a 1/1,000,000 chance of dying if you do........
 
People has lost the ability to judge risk. You will die if you don’t take this pill, you have a 1/1,000,000 chance of dying if you do........

I am not one for conspiracy stuff, but having some idea of how grubby the pharma world can be, and other agendas, it does seem mad to me.
 
If that one contraceptive maker were causing clotting at the rate currently reported, even if higher than their competitors? Imo yes they would still be authorized but with a warning label "in rare incidences this product may cause blood clots". How it impacted consumer take up would be another matter entirely - reputational risk is very real for both AZ and JNJ now.
It'd kill it stone dead is the more likely scenario. Because in this example (but not the vaccines) people get to choose what product they prefer. Can you see ANYONE choosing to purchase AZ over any other 'brand' if it were market dictated?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top