Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

[davek]

You have to consider people are no longer complying after 4 months of full lockdown. Pubs are safer than uncontrolled indoor gatherings.

Why do outdoor gatherings have to be uncontrolled?

Pubs and restaurants indoors = killer environments. Proven beyond all doubt.

 

[Brennan]

It’s not

I don’t think you can declare it’s not dangerous.

Why it could be dangerous to exercise with a face mask on

www.herts.ac.uk

 

[Brennan]

Whatever next, a special Strictly Come Dancing just for vaccine scientists ?

If Everton ever win a trophy I hope we don’t have any media coverage of it.

 

[grandjoeblue]

Why do outdoor gatherings have to be uncontrolled?

Pubs and restaurants indoors = killer environments. Proven beyond all doubt.

Ok so let's just carry on with people having house parties with 20 people in one living room. I'm sure thats far safer.

 

[davek]

Why do you care...

You’re such a bitter man, these people did some tv interviews, so what. They’re saving lives doing research while you sit on a football forum all day chatting wham.

Your lack of self awareness of your own meagre contributions to society while you tear others down is pretty hilarious.

Saving lives is appreciated. Using it as a platform for vainglory is not. The woman in question is a business woman as well as a scientist. I think that's worth pointing out.

You're letting personal animosity get in the way of reason. It's not my fault you post snide BS most of the time.

 

[Brennan]

Saving lives is appreciated. Using it as a platform for vainglory is not. The woman in question is a business woman as well as a scientist. I think that's worth pointing out.

You're letting personal animosity get in the way of reason. It's not my fault you post snide BS most of the time.

Oh no, it absolutely is in your case.

And er, pot meet kettle.

 

[davek]

Ok so let's just carry on with people having house parties with 20 people in one living room. I'm sure thats far safer.

That's apocryphal. The vast majority of people aren't partying with 20 others in houses. They are law abiding.

Stop making up false equivalents.

 

[davek]

Oh no, it absolutely is in your case.

And er, pot meet kettle.

You've yet to expand on your claim that the use of Pfizer 12 weeks apart hasn't prevented the UK administering more full doses.

An omission I dont think has been lost on the forum.

 

[davek]

Whatever next, a special Strictly Come Dancing just for vaccine scientists ?

Dont bet against it.

 

[Brennan]

You've yet to expand on your claim that the use of Pfizer 12 weeks apart hasn't prevented the UK admonistering more full doses.

An omission I dont think has been lost on the forum.

Probably because I never said it.

 

[davek]

Probably because I never said it.

You definitley did. Your view was that the UK wouldn't be no nearer the top of the double dose administered *table* even if Pfizer had been rolled out twice "4 weeks apart".

Why do you believe that; and how are you stating that with apparent authority?

 

[JimmyJeffers]

I don’t think you can declare it’s not dangerous.

Why it could be dangerous to exercise with a face mask on

www.herts.ac.uk

You googled ‘is wearing a mask whilst exercising dangerous’ and went past all the research articles that said it was ok to find one that said more research is needed whilst fencing cos they’re wearing a mask under a mask.

 

[Brennan]

You definitley did. Your view was that the UK wouldn't be no nearer the top of the double dose administered *table* even if Pfizer had been rolled out twice "4 weeks apart".

Why do you believe that; and how are you stating that with apparent authority?

Never said that.

 

[Brennan]

You googled ‘is wearing a mask whilst exercising dangerous’ and went past all the research articles that said it was ok to find one that said more research is needed whilst fencing cos they’re wearing a mask under a mask.

I actually didn’t, but ok.

Are you saying the person in the article is lying ?

 

[tsubaki]

Your dates on AZ are incorrect. 500,000 doses were available and were used in vaccinations from the 4th of January. That is why there was such a significant increase in the total number of doses administered between January 4th and January 9th.

er:

By January 8th (a month after the vaccination campaign started) we'd fully vaccinated (all with Pfizer at that point) nearly 400,000 people, with 2.29 million given at least one dose (though that data comes from Jan 10th). We were second in the world at that point in terms of first and second doses given out. Most of those will have been Pfizer jabs (AZ had only started in the first week of January).

so what bit of that is incorrect again?