Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
That can all be done with a will to build up a fit for purpose track and trace system (ie employing experts rather than Tory Party donors). The hospitality sector needs mothballing though. There's no safe possibility of reopening indoor drink and food establishments. They are a menace. Not that I expect them to be kept closed: these Tories have donors in the food and drink industry and they'll reopen them by end of spring.
To clarify, do you think pubs and restaurants should be closed permanently??
 
You almost make it sound like a positive that thousands of small businesses are failing. I bet those 640,000 people who are probably jobless and struggling to pay their bills are happy to see the sector 'redefine' itself. Aren't you a socialist? Very confusing.

its ok, just remind yourself it was a Conservative government that did that - just as it did it to hundreds of thousands of people in the 80s
 

The confusion is people listening to scientists like this covering their own arse with statements and then thinking the end isn't in sight.

It is though.

Politically, what she is saying there isn't tenable. By May, 98% of deaths will be taken out of the equation. After that, even if transmission is high (which I don't think it actually will be), the death rate/ICU capacity won't reflect it.

Some restrictions will continue post-May, but they'll be in the form of guidance rather than lockdown, with some things like major events being restricted. But when we hit July/August, we're back to normal with Track & Trace picking up variants (it'll be routine to test for any cold like symptoms for years now) and booster shots every six to twelve months. Convinced of it.

If we're not, I honestly think you'll be looking at riots. Justifiable riots too.

If we have test and trace - and we 100% need it, urgently - then we will need to have localized lockdowns (probably more strict than they are now, with travel into and out of the area being halted), called when there is a spike of whatever variant it is. The better the test and trace system is though, the lower the likelihood of that needing to happen.

Substantial public disorder is probably coming anyway, whatever happens.
 
That can all be done with a will to build up a fit for purpose track and trace system (ie employing experts rather than Tory Party donors). The hospitality sector needs mothballing though. There's no safe possibility of reopening indoor drink and food establishments. They are a menace. Not that I expect them to be kept closed: these Tories have donors in the food and drink industry and they'll reopen them by end of spring.

Be careful what you wish for. If they closed pubs forever, I could turn our pub into a house, put another six houses in the car park and grounds and turn over a £2M profit. But then we wouldn’t have a pub in the village, nowhere to meet, socialise, raise funds for the school or the kids, nowhere to enjoy Halloween or Bonfire Night, no BBQ’s for the families and no Christmas Carols...but then again £2M, you may be onto something here Dave......
 
If we have test and trace - and we 100% need it, urgently - then we will need to have localized lockdowns (probably more strict than they are now, with travel into and out of the area being halted), called when there is a spike of whatever variant it is. The better the test and trace system is though, the lower the likelihood of that needing to happen.

Substantial public disorder is probably coming anyway, whatever happens.

I don't think so. Because the vaccines currently prevent severe illness, I can see a situation where this is a flu vaccine type booster shot once a year covering variants for reasons of efficacy so as to stop transmission, solely because high transmission increases the chance of a dangerous strain emerging.

But I can't see a situation where a lockdown would be justifiable at all if this isn't killing or even hospitalising people. We don't do it with flu, there's no reason to do it with COVID unless it's much worse than flu, which it has been but by no means will certainly be so in the near future.

People forget - COVID doesn't want to kill people; no virus does. It wants to spread and having a host survive means more chances to transmit. COVID mutations will get less severe over time, not more. We really do have to learn to live with it with the weapons we have to curtail the lethality of it.
 
I don't think so. Because the vaccines currently prevent severe illness, I can see a situation where this is a flu vaccine type booster shot once a year covering variants for reasons of efficacy so as to stop transmission, solely because high transmission increases the chance of a dangerous strain emerging.

But I can't see a situation where a lockdown would be justifiable at all if this isn't killing or even hospitalising people. We don't do it with flu, there's no reason to do it with COVID unless it's much worse than flu, which it has been but by no means will certainly be so in the near future.

People forget - COVID doesn't want to kill people; no virus does. It wants to spread and having a host survive means more chances to transmit. COVID mutations will get less severe over time, not more. We really do have to learn to live with it with the weapons we have to curtail the lethality of it.

Quite.

Thouands of people are killed every winter by flu and tens of thousands more are made seriously ill by it, and yet all throughout winter life goes on.

People being infected by a coronavirus is not in and of itself a public health emergency.
 
If we have test and trace - and we 100% need it, urgently - then we will need to have localized lockdowns (probably more strict than they are now, with travel into and out of the area being halted), called when there is a spike of whatever variant it is. The better the test and trace system is though, the lower the likelihood of that needing to happen.

Substantial public disorder is probably coming anyway, whatever happens.
Test and trace can only work if there's a manageable number of cases. While there are still thousands of cases there's no chance of it working.
 
Quite.

Thouands of people are killed every winter by flu and tens of thousands more are made seriously ill by it, and yet all throughout winter life goes on.

People being infected by a coronavirus is not in and of itself a public health emergency.
I think the argument is that people shouldn’t be dying of flu or other illness and that’s bad.

which, is fair

but, it’s also just life. You don’t shut down countries or regions for these illnesses, so when the vaccines have had the impact that they hopefully will do, and covid becomes like any other illness in that sense, and won’t overwhelm the nhs, then there’s no justification
 
Quite.

Thouands of people are killed every winter by flu and tens of thousands more are made seriously ill by it, and yet all throughout winter life goes on.

People being infected by a coronavirus is not in and of itself a public health emergency.

I was nearly killed by the flu in my 20s. Was horrifying, but the net result wasn't living like a hermit in fear of it ever happening again - instead it's the jab every year and living my life.

That will be where we get to. Indeed, the COVID vaccine has more evidence at this point of a strong immunogenic response than a flu vaccine has simply because of how the flu works (there's a reason a flu pandemic was the feared Disease X rather than a coronavirus one), and my guess would be that deaths from flu will decrease because more people will take it up every year now than did before because of the COVID experience.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top