Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Along with :

Gyms
Hairdressers / Barbers
Beauty Salons
Night Clubs
Bakers
Pet Shops
Florists
Tree Surgeons
Road Maintenance

Schools
Colleges
Universities
Airports
Public Transport
All forms of foreign travel

Vote for Dave, the future is bright.
Tbf, we could do with getting shut of the tree surgeons and road maintenance lot!
 
I think that's adding 1+1 and getting 3.

I've said T&T will persist for years, but it won't be with the aim of preventing a lockdown; it'll be with the aim of detecting dangerous mutations for a booster shot, because the immunogenic response of a vaccine prevents serious illness and, bar a complete change in how the virus works (not the spike protein, I mean in terms of how it actually works inside the human body) and an unprecedented mutation to make it more lethal, that immune response from the vaccine will remain consistent enough to provide a baseline prevention of illness.

No, for me, the reason we actually need T&T and a focus on viral detection in the future is to stop the next pandemic, not necessarily the next COVID strain.

Also, the last bit for me shows the weakness in your argument - we could very well prevent flu killing a few thousand people a year; but the question is whether we want to, given the trade off in civil liberties that would involve. I'd say, clearly, no, we don't. If general hygiene measures like hand sanitisers become more commonplace, good, but we shouldn't be aiming to prevent every death from COVID/flu as the trade off is unviable - notably because by having extreme measures in place you create more death through mental health pressures, people skipping medical appointments for other matters and so on.

People can't just exist; they need to be able to live. It's a balancing act. If 5,000 people die a preventable death in the UK per year from COVID/flu in future years, but it means people live their lives, so be it. It sounds cold to say, but that's just the reality of it.

Christ.

Lots of countries have lower flu deaths than us, Tubey. They don’t go into lockdown, shoot the ill or cancel other people’s medical treatments, or do anything impinging on actual civil liberties.

They take sensible measures that people can easily follow, and aren’t punished for doing. They make sure that they pick up strains that might pose a threat before the numbers of infected overwhelm the local health system.

The results are obvious; they do better than us.

As for we should just accept an extra 5000 dead, where those deaths are easily preventable, just because the majority might be told to wear masks on public transport or not go to work if they are ill, then that is absolutely wrong.

For a start, those 5000 dead are merely the worst effected of probably 15000 people who’ve gone through intensive care and 30000 who’ve been admitted. That’s hundreds of millions of pounds in treatment spent that could have been prevented. It’s beds and staff that could have been used to treat other patients.

No one wants another lockdown, for hospitals to be full, to further affect non-COVID treatments or to further damage the economy.

My point is that unless we sort our preventative system out urgently, with all they goes with it to make it effective, then we are at an entirely preventable risk of disaster. If we’d sorted it out during the first lockdown, chances are we wouldn’t have had this one.
 
I'm well aware - I'm also aware that was before vaccination started in earnest which will stop the vast majority of deaths and serious hospitalisation and approx. 2/3rds of transmission. I'm also aware that the case rate is falling around 25% week on week right now. I'm also aware that between the two peaks of this pandemic we've seen a drop off period of several months naturally, even not accounting for vaccinations.

All of this suggests the end is near for lockdowns.

And nope, she's arse covering. She's saying what I'd expect her to say, and any epidemiologist - because their aim is to provide worst case scenarios to address and the best case scenario to address them.

So, naturally, an epidemiologist will - correctly - tell you that the way to stop colds/flu spreading is to stop people mixing, so we should, in theory, lockdown until the end of time.

The political reality, clearly, makes that a nonsense in practice.

That's why the end is near with this. My guess - 8 March schools, 1 April bars/restaurants, 1 May practical normality barring large indoor events, July/August complete normality with guidance in place instead of restrictions.
If your last paragraph is correct, expect to be back in mass death territory again next winter, because these vaccines cant keep on holding the line against variants. The rate of infections will create more and more of them and the vaccines will be rendered almost neutralised...which is why the murderer Johnson is already talking up a third vaccine, I expect.


Incredible that you cant see that if we carry on with a busted flush economic strategy at the expense of gains through lockdowns we'll see 200,000 dead in this country this time next year. Do you actually give a flying one about that?

WAKE UP FFS.
 
I think we are all human Dave. I too don’t like my fellow humans dying as a result of some Chinese scientist developing a Covid virus and accidentally releasing it into the world, then blaming every other poor sod on the planet for being responsible.......

You're ridiculous. Have you stopped giving away that ale and started drinking it all?
 
Christ.

Lots of countries have lower flu deaths than us, Tubey. They don’t go into lockdown, shoot the ill or cancel other people’s medical treatments, or do anything impinging on actual civil liberties.

They take sensible measures that people can easily follow, and aren’t punished for doing. They make sure that they pick up strains that might pose a threat before the numbers of infected overwhelm the local health system.

The results are obvious; they do better than us.

As for we should just accept an extra 5000 dead, where those deaths are easily preventable, just because the majority might be told to wear masks on public transport or not go to work if they are ill, then that is absolutely wrong.

For a start, those 5000 dead are merely the worst effected of probably 15000 people who’ve gone through intensive care and 30000 who’ve been admitted. That’s hundreds of millions of pounds in treatment spent that could have been prevented. It’s beds and staff that could have been used to treat other patients.

No one wants another lockdown, for hospitals to be full, to further affect non-COVID treatments or to further damage the economy.

My point is that unless we sort our preventative system out urgently, with all they goes with it to make it effective, then we are at an entirely preventable risk of disaster. If we’d sorted it out during the first lockdown, chances are we wouldn’t have had this one.

Yep, and all that will happen passively through an increased awareness about communicable diseases post-COVID and the T&T system.

My point was lockdown isn't justifiable in the future once deaths/ICU capacity aren't high/threatened. That includes whether COVID is relatively high in terms of transmission - if that doesn't equate to hospitalisation/death, then a lockdown simply isn't justified. And neither is any restrictions on civil liberties - for example, masks should not be mandatory if the above scenario is what we're faced with.

The vaccines change the game moving forward.
 
What he actually said was:



Now this is a typical @davek post in that he's actually said there is that there is no safe possibility of reopening indoor drink and food establishments; takeaways or premises that can serve outside (like cafes) weren't actually mentioned (though he didn't draw that distinction). He has said the entire industry should be mothballed, but then again the entire industry doesn't consist of indoor drink and food establishments.

I don't agree with it, but without a proper system to detect and contain outbreaks he is right - these premises might not be safe; nowhere where large numbers of people congregate in an area where this virus could spread are.

Or to put it another way, if the government tells firms that their business model poses too much of a risk and they cannot therefore trade, should the government compensate that business for the lost trade?

But I agree with you that a proper system needs to be in place.

However, once the vaccine has kicked in through the population and is preventing serious illness (i.e. hospitalisation) in the vast majority of cases, there's little really that should be stressed about in terms of covid, because the damage it causes will be severely limited and then it becomes managebale in the same way that flu is managebale - especially if you throw in additional shots annually as booster vaccines which seems to be the general consenus.

If the above is happening, restrictions on crowds etc just aren't justifiable. That doesn't mean go straight back to full normality. But you start off small, steadily increase.
 
If your last paragraph is correct, expect to be back in mass death territory again next winter, because these vaccines cant keep on holding the line against variants. The rate of infections will create more and more of them and the vaccines will be rendered almost neutralised...which is why the murderer Johnson is already talking up a third vaccine, I expect.


Incredible that you cant see that if we carry on with a busted flush economic strategy at the expense of gains through lockdowns we'll see 200,000 dead in this country this time next year. Do you actually give a flying one about that?

WAKE UP FFS.

You're basing that on nothing, and ignoring evidence vaccines reduce transmission by around 2/3rds and the fact the flu mutates every single year yet there's still an immunogenic response from the vaccine, even if efficacy is low - the COVID vaccine does the same; regardless of mutations, COVID remains a coronavirus and therefore will generally act as a coronavirus; it isn't going to morph into an entirely different virus.

They're talking up a third vaccine because, until the whole population is vaccinated, variants pose a danger because vaccine efficacy directly correlates to transmissability, so it makes sense to adapt the vaccine every year to meet the predominant strains in circulation. Again, this happens every year with the flu - booster shots will become the norm for COVID too.
 
Not sure all of that is entirely true, the virus, any virus ultimately doesn’t want to kill us but that can be a an unfortunate side effect of a new virus entering a virgin species. There have been thousands of mutations so far, but worryingly the U.K. and S.A. Variant has shown the virus can evolve quickly and maliciously rather then more placid, that’s a concern and to our detriment to stay alive.

We have seen a changes in the amino acid of both variants and the spike protein, which means a greater viral load, higher transmissibility and risk as the virus evolves to replicate better and infect more hosts. Essentially things that were at a low risk 6 months ago can now be moderate to high risk with the new variants. Essentially they are super Covid particularly the SA strain. The U.K. variant has now become the most dominant variant in Western Europe, in a very short space time, its was a huge contributor to the third wave.

Governments don’t want to panic the population but if the SA variant becomes dominant, we’re down a snake rather then up a vaccine ladder. Most of Europe is after closing their borders, this is new very new and I guarantee this is in reaction to fear of his quickly the U.K. variant became dominant in Europe and governments are terrified of the SA variant. We are evolving with our vaccines, Covid is evolving with variants, the U.K. and SA varients are worrying as it shows a malicious evolution rather then a weaker one and a rapid mutation, it’s a wait and see which ultimately prevails but the war with the virus has a few more twists and turns.

As for lock downs if the SA varient get a hold in a country, frequent lock downs won’t be ruled out.
Agreed.

If our 'leaders', globally are serious about getting rid of this you can well imagine an extended period of managed international isolation with little to no international travel. Not going to put any money on this happening though.
 
Not sure all of that is entirely true, the virus, any virus ultimately doesn’t want to kill us but that can be a an unfortunate side effect of a new virus entering a virgin species. There have been thousands of mutations so far, but worryingly the U.K. and S.A. Variant has shown the virus can evolve quickly and maliciously rather then more placid, that’s a concern and to our detriment to stay alive.

We have seen a changes in the amino acid of both variants and the spike protein, which means a greater viral load, higher transmissibility and risk as the virus evolves to replicate better and infect more hosts. Essentially things that were at a low risk 6 months ago can now be moderate to high risk with the new variants. Essentially they are super Covid particularly the SA strain. The U.K. variant has now become the most dominant variant in Western Europe, in a very short space time, its was a huge contributor to the third wave.

Governments don’t want to panic the population but if the SA variant becomes dominant, we’re down a snake rather then up a vaccine ladder. Most of Europe is after closing their borders, this is new very new and I guarantee this is in reaction to fear of his quickly the U.K. variant became dominant in Europe and governments are terrified of the SA variant. We are evolving with our vaccines, Covid is evolving with variants, the U.K. and SA varients are worrying as it shows a malicious evolution rather then a weaker one and a rapid mutation, it’s a wait and see which ultimately prevails but the war with the virus has a few more twists and turns.

As for lock downs if the SA varient get a hold in a country, frequent lock downs won’t be ruled out.

The pattern has been greater transmissibility with variants, not lethality. You're right that something new like COVID in a human host will play tricks, but ultimately over time viruses become less lethal, not more, until they hit a 'sweet spot'. For example, the 1918 Spanish Flu was a flu variant that was clearly more transmissable, but was more lethal mostly because of the dire social conditions of the first world war, not because the strain itself was significantly more deadly.

The SA variant simply hits efficacy; there's no evidence is hinders the immunogenic response for severe disease. It possibly creates more mild symptoms as it 'unlocks the door' quicker to the body with its delivery mechanism, but the vaccine still creates an immune response that ultimately deals with it.

And that's what people continue to miss - we can't eradicate COVID. If it infects, spreads but does little damage, then fine - we deal with that as we get it. The problem pre-vaccine was we had no bodily defence to it due to it being completely new to us; the vaccine takes that weakness away. We have a baseline response to what it can do to us.
 
Yep, and all that will happen passively through an increased awareness about communicable diseases post-COVID and the T&T system.

My point was lockdown isn't justifiable in the future once deaths/ICU capacity aren't high/threatened. That includes whether COVID is relatively high in terms of transmission - if that doesn't equate to hospitalisation/death, then a lockdown simply isn't justified. And neither is any restrictions on civil liberties - for example, masks should not be mandatory if the above scenario is what we're faced with.

The vaccines change the game moving forward.

Sorry Tubey if I’ve misread your post but if your take on this is as it appears, after the twelve months of what we’ve just gone through, is to effectively do nothing until a new variant starts to impact more than we expect it to on hospitalisation / ICU admission rates then I honestly have no idea how to respond to you.

You’re basically just saying many people should die because we CBA to do anything, especially learn from our mistakes.
 
Sorry Tubey if I’ve misread your post but if your take on this is as it appears, after the twelve months of what we’ve just gone through, is to effectively do nothing until a new variant starts to impact more than we expect it on hospitalisation / ICU admission rates then I honestly have no idea how to respond to you.

You’re basically just saying many people should die because we CBA to do anything, especially learn from our mistakes.

No, not "do nothing" - I'm saying the emergence of a variant alone isn't enough to justify a lockdown. When T&T detects it, then that should do as it should, track it, keep it subdued then the booster shot for it - but if its not killing people in serious numbers or hospitalising them, then a lockdown as a response isn't justifiable.
 
No, not "do nothing" - I'm saying the emergence of a variant alone isn't enough to justify a lockdown. When T&T detects it, then that should do as it should, track it, keep it subdued then the booster shot for it - but if its not killing people in serious numbers or hospitalising them, then a lockdown as a response isn't justifiable.
I know plenty of people who are deleting track and trace App as they just can’t afford the time of work on SSP mate.

It just won’t work long term.
 
I know plenty of people who are deleting track and trace App as they just can’t afford the time of work on SSP mate.

It just won’t work long term.

It won't be done by app, it'll be done by GPs, public awareness campaigns to test if have cold symptoms, random public spot tests in regions etc.

The app is just a tool in a much larger kit.

P.S. People won't be compelled to isolate in the future automatically; again that would be a tool to be used if things got out of hand in terms of hospitalisations/deaths. People are looking at the here and now and not the future - it will be very different to what we've experienced the last 12 months.
 
Agreed.

If our 'leaders', globally are serious about getting rid of this you can well imagine an extended period of managed international isolation with little to no international travel. Not going to put any money on this happening though.

We will get a reprieve in the Spring/Summer months mate. The vaccine is super news, but essentially we are treating Covid from 6 months ago. The U.K. and SA variants have evolved, the SA variant in particular is Super Covid. The evolution has seen things that were low risk now have become lower to high risk.

Governments are keeping the population calm, they are trading of the good news of the vaccine politically at the moment. But look the evidence is there. If you want to look.

The U.K. variant spread like wildfire through Europe, it’s highly transmissible as the amino acids evolved to bind to cells better, replicate more and have a greater viral load, what we have seen is cases all across Europe surge and stubbornly refuse to come down - with previous measures that worked. The death toll average has increased massively.

The SA variant is even worse, it’s evolved more quickly then even the U.K. variant and has punched holes in our vaccines so far. It’s massively self Rep,I sting and highly transmissible again we are seeing changes in the amino acids and spike protein.

If you look around you are aware you will how worried governments are - during all this we never restricted the borders, it’s now become standard, the whole of Europe is in lockdown, the U.K. Government have had outbreaks of it already and essentially I believe the army were going to door testing for it and shutting down communities, if the SA variant becomes dominant in a country it’s a huge body blow to our defence this year. The U.K. variant has already shut down Europe for the winter.

The vaccines are great and will offer some protection, however they were not designed for the variant, like I said we are treating Covid of 6 months ago. Of course we will see a booster I suspect in the Autumn to try and nail the SA variant.

But there is no point now drinking the Kool aide and not seeing it and to a lesser extent the U.K. variant as serious problems, despite our advancement with the vaccines.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top