it absolutely isn't, but surely there you blame the firm responsible
and in response to your other post, which I at least half agree with...
You can hold them to account, but it seems evidently clear that AZ stressed this to the EU when they were in talks. Again, their CEO makes a point of saying that they emphasised that they had already been delayed, they were already behind where they needed to be, but the EU insisted on getting their doses at the same time as the UK, despite a 3-month difference. Given this vaccine has been developed in 10-11 months, having a quarter of that as lead-time one way or the other is absolutely going to make a big difference and is certainly fair for AZ to have pointed out.
I'm seeing both sides, I just think the EU Commission have ballsed this up in the first place by taking charge of a situation it had no need to take charge of. Why in the world could it not have just said to those four nations that had an agreement back in June that they were fine to go ahead? In the meantime, the Commission could have used that deal as a basis for separate negotiations on behalf of the other member states if required?
