Oh,it is cool. I am happyYou’ll be able to move around a lot more freely though, as those groups that are at most risk will have been vaccinated.
Oh,it is cool. I am happyYou’ll be able to move around a lot more freely though, as those groups that are at most risk will have been vaccinated.
Indeed, I am not too arsed about the vaccs tbhTier 5 for me I think. But count yourself lucky that you are mid forties and healthy. Meanwhile, the rates per 100k seem to be reducing and the vaccination is being rolled out. When the Oxford vaccination is approved there will no doubt be widespread jabs given by your local GP. The numbers will build up quite quickly I would think. Hopefully we will see the back of this before too many more die from it.....
I thought the vaccinators were the first to get it?
I mean, this is gonna sound blunt again, but it’s not the care home residents who are at risk of catching covid in terms of those being the source of an outbreak.
a lot still aren’t allowed visitors outside of a bubble, if at all (depends on the care home). That’s obviously a risk, but the main risk to bringing covid into a home is the staff.
they get tested weekly, again depending on the care home but the vast majority weekly, so surely if it’s to ringfence care home patients, the priority should be getting the staff vaccinated?
It’s not. But the 90-year-old is surely less of a risk of spreading this thing to other patients than a member of staff who lives away from the care home, goes to the supermarket etc etc?A 90-year old is at risk of dying from this thing, why's it weird they're given the vaccine first?
Yep, totally understand that. I suppose I meant it in the way of is it likely to save more lives in the next few months if the residents or staff are the ones who get vaccinated first? That was my point. Appreciate it needs both groups to be vaccinated to work fully!They need to vaccinate the residents and staff. It's not been fair having people kept away from their families since March.
Ringfencing is a word that's thrown around, but it's not that simple at all. You have to look at the effect of loneliness on these people too. They deserve some form of interaction with their children, and wider family etc.
Yep, totally understand that. I suppose I meant it in the way of is it likely to save more lives in the next few months if the residents or staff are the ones who get vaccinated first? That was my point. Appreciate it needs both groups to be vaccinated to work fully!
He should be quarantined for spreading a deadly new virus, the symptoms of which involve sudden convulsions of laughter followed by a desperate dash to the toilet.I keep thinking I must have reached the limit of my dislike for him but then he produces more ammunition.
It’s not. But the 90-year-old is surely less of a risk of spreading this thing to other patients than a member of staff who lives away from the care home, goes to the supermarket etc etc?
If you target the likely source of a potential outbreak first, isn’t that likely to save more lives?
Exactly - and I think that is what’s happening generally - but surely the staff are at more risk of contracting this than the residents in terms of just picking it up in every day life.I think front line staff in the NHS and care homes should be vaccinated first. Keep the essential work force protected and it also stops them spreading it to people who they are in contact with.
Ey?Vaccinate a 90-year old woman = definitely save 1 life.
Vaccinate a carehome worker = possibly save some lives, possibly won't make a difference.
World needs to work on certainties not possibilities.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.