As I suspected and stated last Friday. This 'moving around' story is BS. IMO, it's designed to preserve a very small order of this vaccine for the NHS, and they're having to spin this story because the Oxford vaccine isn't anywhere near as efficacious as Pfizer or Moderna (and probably not even Sputnik), but that's the only one that will be administered to the vast majority in this country.
Again, this government has made a complete balls up of the vaccine to go along with their failure to lockdown early enough, failure to ensure enough PPE was there for the first wave, failure on trace and track testing, and failure on its tier system.
Mark my words, many people who can afford to shop around will do so and get hold of Pfizer's vaccine...by hook or by crook.
But tbf Dave, this virus doesn't really impact all that many people in terms of genuine illness.
As long as the vaccines (plural) do their job and give protection, then that's fine. If NHS workers and vulnerable groups get the Pfizer one, for example, and then people my age with no underlying issues have to get one which is slightly less effective, but more easily accessible, then where's the harm.
Plus, even if it's 75% (which is the low end of their scale as it goes to 90% when dosed differently), that's still more protection than the flu jab offers, which is surely the most widely administered vaccine every year.
We're the first country to be rolling out the vaccine, one way or the other. I'm not saying that that is the government or Britain being great or whatever, but it's happening. that's a positive. 400,000 people (obviously assuming no waste which isn't gonna happen but anyway) could well be vaccinated in this country in just over a weeks' time. How is that a bad thing?