toffee82
Player Valuation: £35m
No it doesn't.It says 70% effective for 1 dose but 90% effective with two doses. They probably should do 2 then.
Both the 70% and 90% figure come from two doses.
The 90% comes from a lower initial dose.
No it doesn't.It says 70% effective for 1 dose but 90% effective with two doses. They probably should do 2 then.
Fair enough. 70% is still pretty good for a vaccine though, even if they used that one it would still result in normality.No it doesn't.
Both the 70% and 90% figure come from two doses.
The 90% comes from a lower initial dose.
This is a very good point.70% is actually a good result. For a portion of the trial it was 90% when giving a smaller initial dose.
Compared to the other two, this is far easier to store and distribute as well as being much cheaper.
This has the potential to save more lives than the other two.
Also, when more data is published it might be the case that the success is higher in certain age groups. This means that having multiple vaccines available to target different age groups.
Vaccines are late, when average Joe aged 35 will be getting it will be already June/July 2021, not so urgent anymore as we will have developed an herd immunity by then.
that's the point. by June/July masks will be a thing of past, crowds will be allowed etc. even if we U35 people don't get vaccinated thanks to herd immunity. I stopped looking at vax news myself.Average Joe aged 35 doesn’t need a vaccine in reality.
At a logical guess , the higher dose triggers a more aggressive reaction in the immune system with it being essentially a foreign virus."When volunteers were given two "high" "doses the protection was 62%, but this rose to 90% when people were given a "low" dose followed by a high one. It's not clear why there is a difference."
You’re quoting me saying they failed in spite of their authoritarian nature, not because of it...You: "The virus originated in markets which followed shocking health and safety and food standards, yet the authoritarian government chose not to shut them down."
![]()
This is embarrassing.
I’m going to be careful until I’ve been vaccinated. NEAAverage Joe aged 35 doesn’t need a vaccine in reality.
No idea, and I can't see this government providing objective criteria.Will Merseyside be in tier 2 in December?
Last time it was above 100 per 100,000 is tier 2 and tier 3 was if the health service is struggling. Liverpool and merseyside are below 250 per 100,000 at the moment and its dropping massively every week so you'd think it would be tier 2 at first.No idea, and I can't see this government providing objective criteria.
I’m going to be careful until I’ve been vaccinated. NEA
Sure? They a lot of flak for not having transparent criteria last time mate, maybe they did cobble something together at the end though.Last time it was above 100 per 100,000 is tier 2 and tier 3 was if the health service is struggling. Liverpool and merseyside are below 250 per 100,000 at the moment and its dropping massively every week so you'd think it would be tier 2 at first.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.