The binman chronicles
Player Valuation: £80m
There are holes in that cage, back to the drawing board. Air tight please.
So did Mengele.The British doctors may have been on TV but they have an actual medical degree just like the other 60+ doctors that are referenced in the article.
I'm guessing you never use the NHS if you think all doctors in white coats are fools.
Let’s have a look at the main signatories shall we...
Dr. Martin Kulldorff, professor of medicine at Harvard University, a biostatistician, and epidemiologist with expertise in detecting and monitoring of infectious disease outbreaks and vaccine safety evaluations.
Dr. Sunetra Gupta, professor at Oxford University, an epidemiologist with expertise in immunology, vaccine development, and mathematical modeling of infectious diseases.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, professor at Stanford University Medical School, a physician, epidemiologist, health economist, and public health policy expert focusing on infectious diseases and vulnerable populations.
VERSUS
Dr. Davek, regular poster, CCP spy, played the game like a young Glen Hoddle (his words not mine), bicycle and Lycra enthusiast. Did I miss anything?
You said people under a certain age will not be vaccinated. Then mentioned the flu shot which anyone can get.
The vaccine will be rolled out to who needs it the most. It will be prioritised. The vaccine task force literally stated that this virus is more of a threat to certain demographics than others and that the actual vaccine could carry more risk to certain groups than the virus itself. So the experts are analysing this from a social, demographic perspective. But when you do that in here it’s forbidden for some reason.
Lockdowns on the other hand are for everybody. There is no other way around this apparently.
I can happily listen to (and still disagree with) anyone who says we need general lockdowns as shielding a certain section of society is impossible to do so. I may not agree but I can understand that position.
However we have now reached a point where saying “hey; this seems to really hit the elderly a lot harder than people under 40, maybe we can use that data to come up with some alternative solution to a blanket lockdown” is seen as a controversial and abhorrent statement.
Furthermore in order to argue the case for general lockdowns the focus is now on “long Covid”. When you point out that all viruses can cause long term health complications this is ignored.
Alasdair Munro (@apsmunro) Tweeted: @kevinsmith_tcnc People who work in infectious diseases recognise there is not much special about SAR-CoV-2 except that no one had immunity to it
![]()
Cold and Flu Complications
Even a mild cold or bout of influenza can compromise your immune system and lead to other health concerns.www.everydayhealth.com
If evidence over time is scientifically gathered demonstrating that enough people suffer with long term (meaning actual months not a few weeks after a virus) after effects then maybe those at the vaccine task force will change their way of thinking as well and feel the need for mass vaccination. Until that happens then a debate around whether or not lockdowns should be demographically based is fair and justified.
Maybe we should ignore all doctors on anything medical related and ask the opinion of randomly selected people on the Internet who have access to Wikipedia.So did Mengele.
On that very point, from the NI Govt briefing today:So month on month they have increased testing, moving from only essential to anyone and everyone who wants one.
This coincides with a second wave of the virus .
Surely a coincidence right? They have found more cases after testing more people with more scenarios required to make people have a test.
What if the numbers have not really changed at all, we just know more of them? The only reason why students and under 40s suddenly have started getting it is because they weren't grouped together that much before? Now they are in university and as if by magic, their numbers jumped up.
I know some of you take stock in the guess how many cases there are method rather than find out. But what if we haven't seen an increase in cases since July? We are just testing more of them now?
It’s not illegal to gather indoors to provide care or assistance to a vulnerable person.Side point.
My suggestion of asking elderly and sick to shield and to protect them is barbaric and evil right? That's what you keep telling me?
Right now it's illegal for anyone to visit said sick and elderly, not frowned upon, literally illegal.
Isn't that worse? Making it illegal for anyone to visit elderly and forcing them to leave their house where there is a virus that could kill them?
And I'm the monster.
No but it does coincide with more mass gatherings of people.On that very point, from the NI Govt briefing today:
Looking in detail at current figures, Chief Scientific Adviser Prof Ian Young says the seven-day rolling average of new cases confirmed per day is about 500 and "has more than doubled within the last week".
He adds that although testing has increased in the last few days, the amount of tests has only risen by about 15%, during a period when the number of positive test results has "doubled".
"The increase in cases is not due to increased testing."
Maybe you should go with the orthodoxy amongst health experts and not give too much attention to cranks on the fringe?Maybe we should ignore all doctors on anything medical related and ask the opinion of randomly selected people on the Internet who have access to Wikipedia.
But family and friends can't go and visit without breaking the law.It’s not illegal to gather indoors to provide care or assistance to a vulnerable person.
On that very point, from the NI Govt briefing today:
Looking in detail at current figures, Chief Scientific Adviser Prof Ian Young says the seven-day rolling average of new cases confirmed per day is about 500 and "has more than doubled within the last week".
He adds that although testing has increased in the last few days, the amount of tests has only risen by about 15%, during a period when the number of positive test results has "doubled".
"The increase in cases is not due to increased testing."

For me it’s down to people being less cautious and far too many declining to follow the guidance. Mask adherence is embarrassing locally and as for distancing in shops it is less than good.No but it does coincide with more mass gatherings of people.
I'm not talking about the past week, I'm talking about the last 4 months. We were testing far less people back in July as we are now, numbers have risen with more testing.
Is it a coincidence or not? That I can't answer.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.