Did the TTI form part of it? I don't recall it did.
Every assessment from every agency involved?. You'll need to expand on that. The only official thing I saw was the scientists didn't approve regrading alert level to 3. But that wasn't part of the 5 tests anyway.
Test 4: Operational challenges including testing and PPE are in hand, with supply able to meet future demand
Test 5: Confident that any adjustments to the current measures will not risk a second peak of infections that overwhelms the NHS
I'm not being flippant here, but how do you think a national emergency is managed? Because the Government and SAGE, while they should be listening to localised reports don't seem to be. Escalation at local level should inform national strategy. If an area looks at those 5 tests and says 'we aren't meeting 3 of those' but national guidance is introduced without local control, the area assessment still says it's not safe, but the policy will happen regardless.
If I said 'nationally our average is 0.5 so schools, restaurants and cinemas can open!' Now it may be that the average in that scenario is from data where everyone returns a result of between 0.4-0.6. You might then you might think 'great I'll go to the cinema'.
Would you think the same if the national average was 0.6 but it was averaged between a data range of 0.3-1.2?