I don't disagree with the need to protect the economy, it is essential for recovery. However, statutorily, and ethically, protection of life should be afforded the highest priority - which are the two measures the Government and anyone else should be using for their strategy.
I'm well versed in decisions about acceptable loss of life and defensible decision making, but they should be applied where there is a dilemma about balancing equivalent demands.
As I made reference to yesterday, and I think it's a really prescient point about where people attach their decision making, protection of human life in these circumstances is always approached with 'wait and see' but the economy always demands 'immediate intervention'.
It's odd to hear, for example, the same voices, confidently declaring the UK can easily survive 'short to medium term' financial disruption caused by a No Deal Brexit absolutely beside themselves at the insistence of 3 months of economic lockdown.