Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
We have larger populations than both France and Italy. We have a much larger population than Spain. Our number line up with these countries....
It might just be me, but I really do not get why people are undertaking direct comparisons with regards to population: e.g. Spain Vs. UK population.

At worst, it's % of the population or just simply the number of deaths. Why does having a larger population mean how many have died should be more acceptable?

Urban density, GDP, age of the population, health care provision and general health comparisons (smokers etc.) are more sensible comparisons.

In reality, we should be aiming for the lost number of deaths possible rather than saying, "Oh well, we've got ten more million so another few thousand is fine."
 
Thanks.

So, just to be clear, the day Johnson gave his roadmap out of the lockdown the lowest number of daily deaths in the UK since the start of the crisis at the end of March was recorded...and the day after, when his roadmap was being given 'detail' in the media, it fell even further....and now a day later it's back up to numbers we've commonly seen since the middle of April?

You can, therefore, presumably get my point?
 
Thanks.

So, just to be clear, the day Johnson gave his roadmap out of the lockdown the lowest number of daily deaths in the UK since the start of the crisis at the end of March was recorded...and the day after, when his roadmap was being given 'detail' in the media, it fell even further....and now a day later it's back up to numbers we've commonly seen since the middle of April?

You can, therefore, presumably get my point?
According to the BBC, that's potentially short by about 14,000.

 
Thanks.

So, just to be clear, the day Johnson gave his roadmap out of the lockdown the lowest number of daily deaths in the UK since the start of the crisis at the end of March was recorded...and the day after, when his roadmap was being given 'detail' in the media, it fell even further....and now a day later it's back up to numbers we've commonly seen since the middle of April?

You can, therefore, presumably get my point?

No. I can’t get your point Dave. The numbers during the week before and after address are around the 600 mark. Nothing has changed.
 
It might just be me, but I really do not get why people are undertaking direct comparisons with regards to population: e.g. Spain Vs. UK population.

At worst, it's % of the population or just simply the number of deaths. Why does having a larger population mean how many have died should be more acceptable?

Urban density, GDP, age of the population, health care provision and general health comparisons (smokers etc.) are more sensible comparisons.

In reality, we should be aiming for the lost number of deaths possible rather than saying, "Oh well, we've got ten more million so another few thousand is fine."
Urban density is invariably brought up with its obvious disadvantages but a more balanced assessment would also bring up things like how quickly people can get to hospitals or testing centers, ability to work/order goods from home, many rural areas have higher % elderly residents etc.
 
Thanks.

So, just to be clear, the day Johnson gave his roadmap out of the lockdown the lowest number of daily deaths in the UK since the start of the crisis at the end of March was recorded...and the day after, when his roadmap was being given 'detail' in the media, it fell even further....and now a day later it's back up to numbers we've commonly seen since the middle of April?

You can, therefore, presumably get my point?
As Boris, address was pre-recorded NO, I dont get your point!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top