arminisgod
Player Valuation: £35m
Deaths not the key issue is it? Main thing is how many, and the trend in new infections.
Also starting to fall even with more tests
Deaths not the key issue is it? Main thing is how many, and the trend in new infections.
They can’t man them. The main one can’t operate at anywhere near its capacity and was reported as actually turning patients away, as they haven’t got the skilled ICU resource. They’re white elephants.
How do you know they cannot be staffed ?
Stats should be confined to the coronavirus threads onlyFeeling very unloved here Brisan
Pete they are hospitals with several hundred beds. To staff them requires staff, and the Army cannot assemble nurses in three weeks.
Not really when we're all in lockdown and have been for some time. The R value is below R1, around R0.7. Our infections peaked before lockdown as people had already began being more hygiene conscious and distancing/ isolating themselves. So the main thing is definitely the trends of deaths atm and that they keep fallingDeaths not the key issue is it? Main thing is how many, and the trend in new infections.
Again I would ask...how do you know they cannot be staffed....
Around a quarter of the 3,600 beds at the London Nightingale Hospital could be used for patients from Kent and Sussex, HSJ has learned.
Trusts in the two counties have been told they would also need to send their staff to work at the new hospital. For every eight patients they transfer to the site – at the Excel conference centre in East London – they must provide a nurse and a support worker.
Meanwhile, plans to set up a similar facility in the south east have been temporarily abandoned.
HSJ understands the plan was outlined to local trust chiefs last week. The proposal set out to local leaders was that the most seriously ill patients needing intensive care would stay at hospitals in Kent and Sussex, but other patients who were not critically unwell could be transferred to the Excel.
One senior source familiar with the proposals said the proposal to transfer staff “did not sit comfortably with them,” due to growing staff shortages locally. Many hospitals in the region are already seeing as many as 20 per cent of staff absent due to the covid-19 outbreak.
No, neither the patient nor their doctors are aware they are given a placebo to avoid introducing bias (either deliberate or unconscious) into the study. Not all studies are 50% placebo either, iirc in the recent remdesivir trials it was only a third who got placebo. But that x% will get a placebo is clearly detailed on the consent form - or at least is meant to be as haven’t been involved in a trial myself!Are they aware that they have only been given a placebo?. Or aware that there is a 50% chance they are given a placebo.? Apologies if that information is contained within one of the links you posted.
Also what do you think about my comments about the death rates. Although we don't have any figures on recoveries here in the UK, the impression given is that death rate for those who spend lengthy times in hospital is a lot more than 10%. Well that's my take anyway.
because the instructions were that staff had to be sent to the Nightingale whenever patients were transferred (one member of staff per eight patients):
![]()
South East trusts told: send patients and staff to covid-surge hospital
Around a quarter of the 3,600 beds at the London Nightingale Hospital could be used for patients from Kent and Sussex, HSJ has learned.www.hsj.co.uk
Yes right. Like it was not already.Nice to see 'You'll Never Walk Alone' become forever associated with a horrible plague.
We have just received the following message from the Préfecture de la Creuse.
I wonder how it would go down in free and easy England. It goes like this:-
Yes, I understand all that, but NHS rules can be slightly amended (see ppe) for an emergency, some EU countries have excess capacity and could allow staff to be brought in, the army has additional staff, non EU countries that have beaten this, Australia, NZ and those not overwhelmed Canada may actually be able to provide cover... Merely saying that they cannot be staffed is folly, there is always an answer...just because we are not aware of any preparations does not mean they don’t exist......
I’m assuming based on the below that patients enrolled in the NIH were hospitalizedAre they aware that they have only been given a placebo?. Or aware that there is a 50% chance they are given a placebo.? Apologies if that information is contained within one of the links you posted.
Also what do you think about my comments about the death rates. Although we don't have any figures on recoveries here in the UK, the impression given is that death rate for those who spend lengthy times in hospital is a lot more than 10%. Well that's my take anyway.
Participants in the NIH-sponsored trial must have laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and evidence of lung involvement, including rattling sounds when breathing (rales) with a need for supplemental oxygen or abnormal chest X-rays, or illness requiring mechanical ventilation. Individuals with confirmed infection who have mild, cold-like symptoms or no apparent symptoms will not be included in the study. In accordance with standard clinical research protocols, eligible patients will provide informed consent to participate in the trial.
Data from Georgia https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6918e1.htm
Among 281 (92.1%) patients who were no longer hospitalized at the time of data abstraction, 48 (17.1%) died.
Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.