Current Affairs Coronavirus Thread - Serious stuff !!!

Status
Not open for further replies.
It sounds daft but masks are only on the assumption that a vaccine will be made. I get the elderly and vulernable wearing them as a means to get out but for me the healthy under 40's in particular really should be prepping themselves up for controlled herd immunity as a back up to no vaccine being found.

I imagine one will likely be found like but there is no guarantees or how long that will take.
What's your plan for this?
 
There is a pub nearby that I pass on my daily walk/run, which I normally do about 9pm. In the past it's opened itself up for EDL/UKIP/Brexit party gatherings.

It appears locked and closed for business but they're clearly still open for a few regulars.

Then you should phone the Police and get it closed down......
 
I'm not sure I want to wear a mask or agree with it being the long term solution. Lots of the people wearing masks I see in the supermarket act like they are totally protected so don't have to distance from everyone else. It's started to wind me up a bit over the last couple of weeks.

Masks are more likely to protect others from the mask wearer - for example sneezing and expelling the virus over a longer distance, they are very limited especially if only scarves and the like. The virus is airbound (and also saliva bound) and can just get through any material we currently manufacture, even surgical masks - so while there's some barrier it's only unfortunately a very poor one.

The reasoning behind not having everyone by law, wear one is trying to ensure the people who need them most- and whose constant exposure will mean they do benefit- get them.

No doubt Joe public and all his mates will be buying right left and centre, this is when it gets out of hand - blame the media both actual and social for saying we should all have one - we really don't need it at all.
 
I'm not sure I want to wear a mask or agree with it being the long term solution. Lots of the people wearing masks I see in the supermarket act like they are totally protected so don't have to distance from everyone else. It's started to wind me up a bit over the last couple of weeks.
If masks help to reduce the spread of the virus people should be encouraged to wear them. I've not seen any evidence of people who wear them behaving differently from those that don't - in supermarkets or elsewhere. Overall, I've been surprised at how well people are following the lock-down restrictions across the board.
 
Can I just point out that the discussion in the thread this morning about 'how do we manage coming out of lockdown; it's a massive risk that people will become reckless or demob happy, will do things unknowingly that are harmful, it'll be difficult to go back to lockdown if we have to because people won't comply' are all considerations as to why countries may have been reluctant to enforce lockdown in the first place.
 
Spoke to the mother-in-law in Czech yesterday about their lockdown (or easing thereof). A couple of crackers were revealed. Pubs and restaurants are opening, but they still expect people to wear masks, and keep 2 metres away from each other. They also demand that facilities keep their toilets shut to the public. So you're expecting people to drink beer through their mask, whilst not socialising with the friends they went to the pub with, and certainly not for that beer to need a release at any time during your stay. I can't see people disobeying that whatsoever.

In book shops, which I believe are among the first things to open, if you touch a book but don't buy it, that book has to go into quarantine for 4 days so any virus you transmitted to the book can die off. She wasn't quite clear why gloves aren't mandated for book shops in the way they are for grocery shops, but yeah, books in quarantine :oops:

She also said the images of the farmer's market in Prague are commonplace around the country, as people went a bit nuts after their 'release'.

This going to be a barrel of fun. I think I’ll just stay in.......
 
Can I just point out that the discussion in the thread this morning about 'how do we manage coming out of lockdown; it's a massive risk that people will become reckless or demob happy, will do things unknowingly that are harmful, it'll be difficult to go back to lockdown if we have to because people won't comply' are all considerations as to why countries may have been reluctant to enforce lockdown in the first place.

Just like Boris, the CMO and the CSA Suggested then.....
 
And the plague that mainly affected blacks, gays, whores and druggies (aka expendables) ...

  • 24.5 million [21.6 million–25.5 million] people were accessing antiretroviral therapy (end ofJune 2019).
  • 37.9 million [32.7 million–44.0 million] people globally were living with HIV (end 2018).
  • 1.7 million [1.4 million–2.3 million] people became newly infected with HIV (end 2018).
  • 770 000 [570 000–1.1 million] people died from AIDS-related illnesses (end 2018).
  • 74.9 million [58.3 million–98.1 million] people have become infected with HIV since the start of the epidemic (end 2018).
  • 32.0 million [23.6 million–43.8 million] people have died from AIDS-related illnesses since the start of the epidemic (end 2018).
... which makes the current business look a bit undramatic, but affects whites and middle classes.
 
There is a pub nearby that I pass on my daily walk/run, which I normally do about 9pm. In the past it's opened itself up for EDL/UKIP/Brexit party gatherings.

It appears locked and closed for business but they're clearly still open for a few regulars.

It was only a matter of time really.

Via a mate in the North End, I know of a couple of pubs that are open via the back door and the Turkish barbers by me is doing haircuts on the sly too.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Welcome

Join the Everton conversation today.
Fewer ads, full access, completely free.

🛒 Visit Shop

Support Grand Old Team by checking out our latest Everton gear!
Back
Top